Smith L J
Northwestern University, Office of Clinical Research and Training, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, 710 N. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
BioDrugs. 2001;15(4):239-49. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200115040-00004.
Asthma is an inflammatory disease of the airways that is best treated by minimising exposure to factors that provoke the inflammation (e.g. allergens) and by administering drugs that reduce the inflammatory response. The cornerstone of asthma treatment is inhaled corticosteroids. Their effectiveness is a result of their potent and broad anti-inflammatory properties. Antileukotriene drugs (leukotriene modifiers) provide an alternative and novel approach to the treatment of asthma. The novelty of these new compounds is that their effectiveness is firmly based on the pathophysiology of asthma, specifically the role played by the cysteinyl leukotrienes. At the same time, the availability of the antileukotriene drugs has stirred debate over when they should be used and how they compare to inhaled corticosteroids. Although the answers are not fully known at this time, the currently available published and presented data are adequate for us to draw some conclusions about their relative effectiveness and role in asthma treatment. The antileukotriene drugs are more effective than placebo, but they are not as effective as inhaled corticosteroids in improving lung function [measured as the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) or peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)], reducing beta(2)-agonist use, and decreasing symptom-free days. In contrast, they may have similar beneficial effects on reducing asthma exacerbations and decreasing peripheral blood eosinophil counts. In the absence of knowing a priori the response of an individual patient to treatment with either therapy, the data favour initiating treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid. However, for patients with mild to moderate disease there are a number of circumstances that support using an antileukotriene drug first. A few examples are aspirin intolerance, predominantly exercise-induced symptoms and problems with using an inhaler or the adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids such as dysphonia and thrush. For patients with more severe disease, inhaled corticosteroids remain the treatment of choice. Antileukotriene drugs should be considered as add-on therapy, especially in view of their possible complementary effects on reducing airway inflammation.
哮喘是一种气道炎症性疾病,最佳治疗方法是尽量减少接触引发炎症的因素(如过敏原),并使用能减轻炎症反应的药物。哮喘治疗的基石是吸入性糖皮质激素。其有效性源于其强大而广泛的抗炎特性。抗白三烯药物(白三烯调节剂)为哮喘治疗提供了一种替代且新颖的方法。这些新化合物的新颖之处在于其有效性牢固地基于哮喘的病理生理学,特别是半胱氨酰白三烯所起的作用。同时,抗白三烯药物的可获得性引发了关于何时使用它们以及它们与吸入性糖皮质激素相比如何的争论。尽管目前这些问题的答案尚未完全明确,但现有的已发表和展示的数据足以让我们就它们在哮喘治疗中的相对有效性和作用得出一些结论。抗白三烯药物比安慰剂更有效,但在改善肺功能[以一秒用力呼气量(FEV₁)或呼气峰值流速(PEFR)衡量]、减少β₂激动剂使用以及增加无症状天数方面,不如吸入性糖皮质激素有效。相比之下,它们在减少哮喘发作和降低外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数方面可能有类似的有益效果。在事先不知道个体患者对这两种治疗方法中任何一种的反应的情况下,数据支持以吸入性糖皮质激素开始治疗。然而,对于轻至中度疾病的患者,有一些情况支持首先使用抗白三烯药物。例如阿司匹林不耐受、主要由运动诱发的症状以及使用吸入器存在问题或吸入性糖皮质激素的不良反应如声音嘶哑和鹅口疮。对于更严重疾病的患者,吸入性糖皮质激素仍然是首选治疗方法。抗白三烯药物应被视为附加治疗,特别是考虑到它们在减轻气道炎症方面可能具有的互补作用。