Suppr超能文献

三维超声在甲状腺容积测量中的应用。

The use of three-dimensional ultrasound for thyroid volumetry.

作者信息

Schlögl S, Werner E, Lassmann M, Terekhova J, Muffert S, Seybold S, Reiners C

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin der Universität Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Thyroid. 2001 Jun;11(6):569-74. doi: 10.1089/105072501750302877.

Abstract

Conventional two-dimensional (2-D) ultrasound is the standard method for the investigation of thyroid morphology. Volume calculations need model assumptions and are observer dependent. The present study performed with a commercially available three-dimensional (3-D) system Freescan added to a conventional ultrasound scanner compares the accuracy of conventional thyroid volumetry to several methods of 3-D volume determination. In vitro measurements were performed on thyroid phantoms with known volumes. The standard deviation of the normalized differences was 8.0% (3-D segmentation) and 10.5% (conventional). For the accuracy of volume determination in human thyroids we performed a postmortem study. The thyroid volume was calculated conventionally by the ellipsoid model and by two 3-D methods (segmentation and the newly developed multiplanar volume approximation). The reference volume was determined after resection by submersion. The standard deviation of the normalized differences was 26.9% for the conventional method, 9.7% for 3-D segmentation and 11.5% for the multiplanar volume approximation, showing significant better results for both 3-D methods and no significant difference between the 3-D methods. The 3-D system, therefore, achieves a better accuracy for thyroid volumetry than the conventional volumetry using planar images. In addition, the 3-D images are stored electronically and can be used for follow-up studies.

摘要

传统二维(2-D)超声是研究甲状腺形态的标准方法。体积计算需要模型假设且依赖于观察者。本研究使用添加到传统超声扫描仪上的商用三维(3-D)系统Freescan进行,比较了传统甲状腺容积测量法与几种三维体积测定方法的准确性。对已知体积的甲状腺模型进行了体外测量。归一化差异的标准差在三维分割法中为8.0%,在传统方法中为10.5%。为了确定人体甲状腺体积测定的准确性,我们进行了一项尸检研究。通过椭球体模型以及两种三维方法(分割法和新开发的多平面体积近似法)常规计算甲状腺体积。通过浸没法在切除后确定参考体积。归一化差异的标准差在传统方法中为26.9%,在三维分割法中为9.7%,在多平面体积近似法中为11.5%,表明两种三维方法的结果明显更好,且两种三维方法之间无显著差异。因此,与使用平面图像的传统容积测量法相比,三维系统在甲状腺容积测量方面具有更高的准确性。此外,三维图像以电子方式存储,可用于随访研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验