Suppr超能文献

血友病合并高滴度抑制物患者的治疗选择。

Therapeutic choices for patients with hemophilia and high-titer inhibitors.

作者信息

Kulkarni R, Aledort L M, Berntorp E, Brackman H H, Brown D, Cohen A R, Ewing N P, Gringeri A, Gruppo R, Hoots K, Leissenger C, Peerlinck K, Poon M C, Wong W Y

机构信息

Pediatrics/Human Development, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1313, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hematol. 2001 Aug;67(4):240-6. doi: 10.1002/ajh.1123.

Abstract

Effective treatment of bleeding episodes in hemophilia with high titer inhibitors (HTI) remains a challenge, despite the fact that the therapeutic armamentarium has expanded considerably over the past few years. Treatment safety has improved with the availability of porcine factor VIII (FVIII) and bypassing products such as recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), and plasma-derived activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (aPCCs) that are virally inactivated. The major drawbacks of rFVIIa and aPCCs are their unpredictable hemostatic effect, lack of laboratory assays to monitor efficacy and dosing frequency, and the risk of thrombosis. The proceedings of a one-day workshop of physicians who specialized in treating patients with hemophilia held in Vienna on May 13, 2000 have been summarized. In making a decision regarding the choice of product, physicians often consider the type of bleeding episode (life or limb threatening), age of the patient, volume of the reconstituted product, previous exposure to plasma derived products, cost, efficacy, and safety. For plasma naïve patients, to achieve rapid hemostasis a majority of the panelists used porcine FVIII (for patients who lack porcine inhibitory antibodies) or rFVIIa. For patients previously treated with plasma derived factors, in addition to the above concentrates, aPCCs were recommended. Although no data exists regarding safety and efficacy, switching products was routinely practiced either because of availability or cost. Furthermore, the panelists were uncertain about the efficacy of bypassing agents in the prevention of joint disease in inhibitor patients. The workshop participants felt that future research offers the best solution to resolve some of the dilemmas faced by clinicians and may help individualise treatment in a hemophilia patient with a high titer inhibitor.

摘要

尽管在过去几年里治疗手段有了显著扩展,但有效治疗伴有高滴度抑制物(HTI)的血友病出血发作仍然是一项挑战。随着猪源因子VIII(FVIII)以及诸如重组因子VIIa(rFVIIa)和经病毒灭活的血浆源性活化凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(aPCCs)等旁路制剂的出现,治疗安全性有所提高。rFVIIa和aPCCs的主要缺点是其止血效果不可预测、缺乏监测疗效和给药频率的实验室检测方法以及存在血栓形成风险。本文总结了2000年5月13日在维也纳举行的为期一天的血友病患者治疗专家研讨会的会议记录。在决定选择何种产品时,医生通常会考虑出血发作的类型(危及生命或肢体)、患者年龄、复溶产品的体积、既往接触血浆源性产品的情况、成本、疗效和安全性。对于未接触过血浆的患者,为实现快速止血,大多数小组成员使用猪源FVIII(适用于缺乏猪抑制性抗体的患者)或rFVIIa。对于既往接受过血浆源性因子治疗的患者,除上述浓缩物外,还推荐使用aPCCs。尽管尚无关于安全性和疗效的数据,但由于可及性或成本原因,常规会更换产品。此外,小组成员不确定旁路制剂在预防抑制物患者关节疾病方面的疗效。研讨会参与者认为,未来的研究为解决临床医生面临的一些困境提供了最佳解决方案,并可能有助于对伴有高滴度抑制物的血友病患者进行个体化治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验