Suppr超能文献

在急诊科采用不同超声可用性方法评估症状性胆石症时的质量与成本效益比较。

Comparison of quality and cost-effectiveness in the evaluation of symptomatic cholelithiasis with different approaches to ultrasound availability in the ED.

作者信息

Durston W, Carl M L, Guerra W, Eaton A, Ackerson L, Rieland T, Schauer B, Chisum E, Harrison M, Navarro M L

机构信息

Kaiser Foundation Hospital, South Sacramento, CA 95823, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2001 Jul;19(4):260-9. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2001.22660.

Abstract

Ultrasound is the imaging study of choice for the detection of gallstones, but ultrasound through medical imaging departments (MI Sono) is not readily available on an immediate basis in many emergency departments (EDs). Several studies have shown that emergency physicians can perform ultrasound themselves (ED Sono) to rule out gallstones with acceptable accuracy after relatively brief training periods, but there have been no studies to date specifically addressing the effect of ED Sono of the gallbladder on quality and cost-effectiveness in the ED. In this study, we investigated measures of quality and cost-effectiveness in evaluating patients with suspected symptomatic cholelithiasis during three different years with distinctly different approaches to ultrasound availability. The study retrospectively identified a total of 418 patients who were admitted for cholecystectomy or for a complication of cholelithiasis within 6 months of an ED visit for possible biliary colic. The percentage of patients who had gallstones documented at the first ED visit improved from 28% in 1993, when there was limited availability of ultrasound through the Medical Imaging Department (MI Sono), to 56% in 1995, when MI Sono was readily available, to 70% in 1997, when both MI Sono and ED Sono were readily available (P <.001). There were also significant differences over the 3 years in the mean number of days from the first ED visit to documentation of gallstones (19.7 in 1993, 10.7 in 1995, 7.4 in 1997, P <.001); the mean number of return visits for possible biliary colic before documentation of gallstones (1.67 in 1993, 1.24 in 1995, and 1.25 in 1997, P <.001); and the incidence of complications of cholelithiasis in the interval between the first ED visit for possible biliary colic and the date of documentation of cholelithiasis (6.8% in 1993, 5.9% in 1995, 1.5% in 1997, P =.049). The number of MI Sonos ordered by emergency physicians per case of symptomatic cholelithiasis identified increased from 1.7 in 1993 to 2.5 in 1995 and dropped back to 1.7 in 1997, when 4.2 ED Sonos per study case were also done. The cost of ED Sonos was more than offset by savings in avoiding calling in ultrasound technicians after regular Medical Imaging Department hours. The indeterminate rate for ED Sonos was 18%. Excluding indeterminates, the sensitivity of ED Sono for detection of gallstones was 88.6% (95% CI 83.1-92.8%), the specificity 98.2% (95% CI 96.0-99.3%), and the accuracy 94.8% (95% CI 92.5-96.5%). We conclude that greater availability of MI Sono in the ED was associated with improved quality in the evaluation of patients with suspected symptomatic cholelithiasis but also with increased ultrasound costs. The availability of ED Sono in addition to readily available MI Sono was associated with further improved quality and decreased costs. The indeterminate rate for ED Sono was relatively high, but excluding indeterminates, the accuracy of ED Sono was comparable with published reports of MI Sono.

摘要

超声是检测胆结石的首选影像学检查方法,但许多急诊科(ED)无法立即通过医学影像科(MI Sono)进行超声检查。多项研究表明,经过相对较短的培训期后,急诊医生可以自行进行超声检查(ED Sono),以排除胆结石,且准确性尚可,但迄今为止,尚无研究专门探讨急诊科胆囊超声检查(ED Sono)对急诊科医疗质量和成本效益的影响。在本研究中,我们调查了在三年中采用截然不同的超声检查可及性方法来评估疑似有症状胆石症患者时的质量和成本效益指标。该研究回顾性地确定了总共418例患者,这些患者在因可能的胆绞痛而到急诊科就诊后的6个月内接受了胆囊切除术或因胆石症并发症入院。首次急诊科就诊时记录有胆结石的患者百分比从1993年的28%有所改善,当时通过医学影像科进行超声检查(MI Sono)的可及性有限;到1995年MI Sono可随时使用时升至56%;到1997年MI Sono和ED Sono均随时可用时达到70%(P<.001)。在这三年中,从首次急诊科就诊到记录胆结石的平均天数也存在显著差异(1993年为19.7天,1995年为10.7天,1997年为7.4天,P<.001);在记录胆结石之前因可能的胆绞痛而进行的复诊平均次数(1993年为1.67次,1995年为1.24次,1997年为1.25次,P<.001);以及在因可能的胆绞痛首次急诊科就诊至记录胆结石日期之间胆石症并发症的发生率(1993年为6.8%,1995年为5.9%,1997年为1.5%,P=.049)。每例确诊的有症状胆石症患者,急诊医生开具的MI Sono检查数量从1993年的1.7次增加到1995年的2.5次,然后在1997年回落至1.7次,而在1997年每个研究病例还进行了4.2次ED Sono检查。急诊科超声检查(ED Sono)的成本因在医学影像科正常工作时间之后无需调用超声技师而节省的费用得到了更多抵消。ED Sono的不确定率为18%。排除不确定结果后,ED Sono检测胆结石的敏感性为88.6%(95%CI 83.1 - 92.8%),特异性为98.2%(95%CI 96.0 - 99.3%),准确性为94.8%(95%CI 92.5 - 96.5%)。我们得出结论,急诊科中MI Sono的更多可及性与疑似有症状胆石症患者评估质量的改善相关,但也与超声检查成本增加相关。除了随时可用的MI Sono外,ED Sono的可及性与质量进一步改善和成本降低相关。ED Sono的不确定率相对较高,但排除不确定结果后,ED Sono的准确性与已发表的MI Sono报告相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验