Cusmano F, Bellelli A, Pedrazzini M, Uccelli M, Ferrozzi F, Devoti D, Affanni M, Pavone P
Istituto di Scienze Radiologiche, Università degli Studi di Parma.
Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense. 2000;71(6):281-9.
Conventional radiography is the first radiological examination in injuries of ankle and foot, but often it has normal findings or it is difficult to execute for critical conditions of patients. Our purpose was to assess the value of CT and MRI in injuries of ankle and foot; we retrospectively reviewed the MR and CT images from 48 patients (age range 18-55 years), whose 16 had a major trauma with other skeletal segment lesions and the remaining a minor trauma limited to ankle and foot. On the basis of our results and experience, we think that in major trauma CT and MRI have similar findings about preoperative evaluation of fractures even if MR better identifies ischemia of fragments, subcortical contusions and lesions of ligaments, capsula or tendons. In minor trauma, MR is superior to CT because it can diagnose lesions of bone and periarticular structures that are difficult or impossible to identify with other instrumental examinations.
传统放射照相术是踝关节和足部损伤的首选放射学检查方法,但通常其检查结果正常,或者对于病情危急的患者难以实施。我们的目的是评估CT和MRI在踝关节和足部损伤中的价值;我们回顾性分析了48例患者(年龄范围18 - 55岁)的MR和CT图像,其中16例有其他骨骼节段损伤的严重创伤,其余为仅限于踝关节和足部的轻度创伤。根据我们的结果和经验,我们认为在严重创伤中,CT和MRI在骨折术前评估方面有相似的表现,即使MR能更好地识别骨折碎片的缺血情况、皮质下挫伤以及韧带、关节囊或肌腱的损伤。在轻度创伤中,MR优于CT,因为它可以诊断出其他仪器检查难以或无法识别的骨和关节周围结构的损伤。