Knowledge, attitudes and management strategies in Scandinavia concerning hormone replacement therapy: a comparison between gynecologists in Denmark, Norway and Sweden.

OBJECTIVES

To describe and compare attitudes, knowledge and management strategies concerning the prescription of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) between gynecologists from three Scandinavian countries.

DESIGN AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional study gynecologists in Denmark (n=386), Norway (n=475) and Sweden (n=1323) were invited by letter to complete and return an enclosed questionnaire. Then 1653 of the 2184 (76%) contacted gynecologists completed and returned the questionnaire.

RESULTS

of the 1653 Scandinavian gynecologists, 42% offered HRT to all women provided there was no contraindication, while 58% recommended HRT to selected women after considering the advantages and disadvantages of HRT. In Norway and Sweden, the proportion of gynecologists routinely prescribing HRT for women without contraindications increased with age and in the oldest age group of gynecologists (>55 years) 49 and 56%, respectively, recommended HRT to all women. The gynecologists were unanimous in their choice of the type of HRT for perimenopausal women as 94% preferred cyclical or sequential combined (estrogen/progestogen) treatment or estrogen monotherapy (orally or transdermally) for hysterectomized women (95%). For postmenopausal women, 75% of the gynecologists offered continuous combined HRT while cyclical combined therapy was chosen by 15% of the gynecologists. No significant differences were found between physicians in the three countries regarding indications and contraindications to HRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Scandinavian gynecologists are generally well informed concerning HRT and liberally recommend HRT for women without contraindications.