Suppr超能文献

接受起搏器或心脏复律除颤器植入患者的左上腔静脉永存:10年经验

Left superior vena cava persistence in patients undergoing pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a 10-year experience.

作者信息

Biffi M, Boriani G, Frabetti L, Bronzetti G, Branzi A

机构信息

Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Chest. 2001 Jul;120(1):139-44. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.1.139.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The persistence of a left superior vena cava (LSVC) has been observed in 0.3% of the general population as established by autopsy. In the adult population, it is an important anatomic finding if a left superior approach to the heart is considered. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of a LSVC in patients undergoing pacemaker (PM) and cardioverter-defibrillator (CD) implantation.

DESIGN

We observed the prevalence of LSVC during a 10-year period; each patient undergoing PM or transvenous CD implantation received a left cephalic/left subclavian venous approach to the heart. With this technique, LSVC persistence is easily diagnosed during lead placement.

RESULTS

A total of 1,139 patients consecutively underwent PM implantation during 10 years: 4 patients had persistent LSCV (0.34%). Among 115 patients undergoing CD implantation, 2 patients with LSVC (1.7%) were observed. Overall LSVC persistence was found in 6 of 1,254 patients (0.47%). Two patients, one of whom had no right superior vena cava (RSVC), received a left-sided PM, whereas two other patients received right-sided devices. Both CD patients received a left-sided active-can device: the first patient with a right-sided lead tunneled to the left pectoral pocket, as a result of poor catheter handling through the LSVC and coronary sinus, and the second patient with a screw-in lead from LSVC. Long-term follow-up of these patients (average +/- SD, 41 +/- 26 months) revealed absence of lead dislodgment and appropriate device function regardless of lead implantation site.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence of LSVC in adults undergoing PM/CD implantation is similar to that of the general population (0.47% in our study). The left-sided implant can be achieved by stylet shaping and by use of active fixation leads in most patients, with a reliable outcome at short term in addition to appropriate device performance at follow-up. Assessment of the RSVC is advisable when planning a right-sided implantation, since a minority of patients lacks this vessel.

摘要

目的

尸检结果显示,一般人群中左位上腔静脉(LSVC)持续存在的发生率为0.3%。在成年人群中,如果考虑采用心脏左侧入路,这是一项重要的解剖学发现。本研究的目的是评估接受起搏器(PM)和心脏复律除颤器(CD)植入的患者中LSVC的发生率。

设计

我们在10年期间观察了LSVC的发生率;每例接受PM或经静脉CD植入的患者均采用左头静脉/左锁骨下静脉入路至心脏。采用这种技术,在放置导线期间很容易诊断出LSVC持续存在。

结果

10年间共有1139例患者连续接受PM植入:4例患者存在持续性LSCV(0.34%)。在115例接受CD植入的患者中,观察到2例LSVC患者(1.7%)。1254例患者中共有6例(0.47%)存在LSVC持续存在。2例患者,其中1例没有右上腔静脉(RSVC),接受了左侧PM植入,而另外2例患者接受了右侧装置植入。2例CD患者均接受了左侧有源罐装置:第一例患者右侧导线经隧道至左胸口袋,原因是通过LSVC和冠状窦的导管操作不佳,第二例患者采用了从LSVC旋入的导线。对这些患者的长期随访(平均±标准差,41±26个月)显示,无论导线植入部位如何,均未出现导线移位且装置功能正常。

结论

接受PM/CD植入的成年人中LSVC持续存在的发生率与一般人群相似(我们的研究中为0.47%)。在大多数患者中,通过塑形探条和使用主动固定导线可以实现左侧植入,短期内结果可靠,随访时装置性能也合适。在计划右侧植入时,建议评估RSVC,因为少数患者缺乏该血管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验