Barbelivien A, Nyman L, Haapalinna A, Sirviö J
A.I. Virtanen Institute, University of Kuopio, Finland.
Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001 Jun;88(6):304-12.
To determine if the inhibition of MAO-A and/or MAO-B activities can influence cognitive processes in adult rats, we analysed whether chronic treatment with clorgyline, 1-deprenyl and pargyline could modify the performance of adult rats in a modified version of the water maze task. The effects of these treatments on locomotor activity and enzyme activities were also assessed. Rats were treated for 24 days with clorgyline (0.2 mg/kg), 1-deprenyl (0.25 mg/kg) and pargyline (I or 10 mg/kg). The treatments were started two weeks before the water maze experiment and continued until the end of testing. The rats were trained to find a submerged platform (6 days: I trial/day; 7 th day: probe trial). Over the next three days, locomotor activity was assessed in an open arena. Treatments with clorgyline (MAO-A inhibitor), 1-deprenyl (MAO-B inhibitor) and pargyline (non-selective MAO inhibitor) did not improve the finding of the hidden platform, when compared to treatment with saline, but significantly increased the swimming speed of the rats. The different treatments, when compared to saline, failed to modify the distance covered and the number of groomings performed in the open arena. However, clorgyline and pargyline, 10 mg/kg, increased the number of faecal boli and clorgyline enhanced the number of rearings made when compared to saline, 1-deprenyl and pargyline, 10 mg/kg. These results indicate that near total inhibition of MAO-A by clorgyline and pargyline as assessed by MAO activity measurement induces an increase in locomotor activity but that inhibition of MAO-A or MAO-B, either alone or combined, does not facilitate spatial learning in adult rats.
为了确定抑制单胺氧化酶A(MAO-A)和/或单胺氧化酶B(MAO-B)的活性是否会影响成年大鼠的认知过程,我们分析了用氯吉兰、司来吉兰和帕吉林进行长期治疗是否会改变成年大鼠在改良版水迷宫任务中的表现。还评估了这些治疗对运动活性和酶活性的影响。用氯吉兰(0.2毫克/千克)、司来吉兰(0.25毫克/千克)和帕吉林(1或10毫克/千克)对大鼠进行24天的治疗。治疗在水迷宫实验前两周开始,并持续到测试结束。训练大鼠寻找一个水下平台(6天:每天1次试验;第7天:探索试验)。在接下来的三天里,在一个开放的场地中评估运动活性。与用生理盐水治疗相比,用氯吉兰(MAO-A抑制剂)、司来吉兰(MAO-B抑制剂)和帕吉林(非选择性MAO抑制剂)治疗并没有改善找到隐藏平台的情况,但显著提高了大鼠的游泳速度。与生理盐水相比,不同的治疗方法未能改变在开放场地中行进的距离和梳理的次数。然而,与生理盐水、司来吉兰和10毫克/千克的帕吉林相比,氯吉兰和10毫克/千克的帕吉林增加了粪便颗粒的数量,氯吉兰增加了竖毛的次数。这些结果表明,通过MAO活性测量评估,氯吉兰和帕吉林对MAO-A的近乎完全抑制会导致运动活性增加,但单独或联合抑制MAO-A或MAO-B并不会促进成年大鼠的空间学习。