Bersh P J
Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):348-50; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-348.
Dinsmoor (2001) rejects shock-frequency reduction as a reinforcer for avoidance behavior, and considers this to be an invalidation of so-called molar avoidance theory. This is a narrow view of operant avoidance theory, for which shock-frequency reduction is by no means the only reinforcer.
丁斯莫尔(2001年)驳斥了将减少电击频率作为回避行为强化物的观点,并认为这是对所谓的整体回避理论的否定。这是对操作性回避理论的一种狭隘看法,因为减少电击频率绝不是唯一的强化物。