Suppr超能文献

分子理论的摩尔浓度与摩尔理论的分子数。

The molarity of molecular theory and the molecularity of molar theory.

作者信息

Bersh P J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):348-50; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-348.

Abstract

Dinsmoor (2001) rejects shock-frequency reduction as a reinforcer for avoidance behavior, and considers this to be an invalidation of so-called molar avoidance theory. This is a narrow view of operant avoidance theory, for which shock-frequency reduction is by no means the only reinforcer.

摘要

丁斯莫尔(2001年)驳斥了将减少电击频率作为回避行为强化物的观点,并认为这是对所谓的整体回避理论的否定。这是对操作性回避理论的一种狭隘看法,因为减少电击频率绝不是唯一的强化物。

相似文献

1
The molarity of molecular theory and the molecularity of molar theory.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):348-50; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-348.
2
Beyond the molar-molecular distinction: we need multiscaled analyses.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):342-7; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-342.
3
Molar versus as a paradigm clash.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):338-41; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-338.
4
A few minor suggestions.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):354-7; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-354.
5
Explaining avoidance: two factors are still better than one.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):357-61; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-357.
6
Two-factor theory has strong empirical evidence of validity.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):362-5; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-362.
8
Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):311-33. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-311.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Avoidance: From Basic Science to Psychopathology.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Feb 12;10:15. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00015. eCollection 2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验