Suppr超能文献

双因素理论有强有力的有效性实证证据。

Two-factor theory has strong empirical evidence of validity.

作者信息

Williams B A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0109, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):362-5; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-362.

Abstract

Traditional two-factor theory is supported by parallels in the clinical literature. Theoretical problems with two-factor theory are obviated by the role of safety signals, which serve as positive conditioned reinforcers and retard the extinction of conditioned fear.

摘要

传统的双因素理论得到了临床文献中相似情况的支持。安全信号的作用消除了双因素理论的理论问题,安全信号作为积极的条件强化物,延缓了条件性恐惧的消退。

相似文献

1
Two-factor theory has strong empirical evidence of validity.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):362-5; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-362.
2
Beyond the molar-molecular distinction: we need multiscaled analyses.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):342-7; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-342.
3
The molarity of molecular theory and the molecularity of molar theory.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):348-50; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-348.
4
Explaining avoidance: two factors are still better than one.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):357-61; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-357.
7
A few minor suggestions.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):354-7; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-354.
8
Molar versus as a paradigm clash.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):338-41; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-338.

引用本文的文献

1
Classical and instrumental conditioning of eyeblink responses in Wistar-Kyoto and Sprague-Dawley rats.
Behav Brain Res. 2011 Jan 1;216(1):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.08.029. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
2
Two-factor theory, the actor-critic model, and conditioned avoidance.
Learn Behav. 2010 Feb;38(1):50-67. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.1.50.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验