Suppr超能文献

瑞典牙科中的防护手套:使用情况及副作用。

Protective gloves in Swedish dentistry: use and side-effects.

作者信息

Wrangsjö K, Wallenhammar L M, Ortengren U, Barregård L, Andreasson H, Björkner B, Karlsson S, Meding B

机构信息

Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Norrbacka, Karolinska Sjukhuset, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2001 Jul;145(1):32-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04278.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the 1980s routine wearing of gloves in dentistry was recommended by health authorities in several countries. However, prolonged glove use is associated with side-effects of irritant and allergic origin.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the extent of glove use and self-reported glove intolerance reactions among Swedish dentists, and to examine how far IgE-mediated allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) occurs in subjects who report rapid itching when in contact with protective gloves.

SUBJECTS/METHODS: A postal questionnaire was answered by 3083 of 3500 licensed dentists, a response rate of 88%. Of the dentists who reported rapidly occurring itching of the hands from gloves, 131 of 170 attended a clinical examination including a skin prick test (SPT) and a serological examination (RAST) for IgE-mediated allergy.

RESULTS

Seventy-three per cent of the dentists reported daily glove use of more than 2 h, 48% more than 6 h a day, and 6% reported no use. NRL gloves were used most frequently (P < 0.001) and were the main material that elicited symptoms (P < 0.001). Female dentists reported more frequent glove use than males, as did young dentists (P < 0.001) compared with older ones. Females also preferred vinyl gloves. Glove intolerance reactions were reported by 723 (23%) dentists, [females 28%, males 21% (P < 0.001)] and were more common in younger dentists. Of the 417 dentists with reported hand eczema during the previous year, 54% reported glove intolerance, compared with 20% of the dentists without hand eczema (P < 0.001). A logistic regression analysis including hand eczema, age, sex and atopy showed that all these factors contributed significantly to the risk of glove intolerance, and that hand eczema was a stronger factor than atopy. In 15 of 131 (11%) dentists examined for reported glove-related itch, latex allergy was verified by SPT and/or RAST. Glove-related conjunctivitis, rhinitis and asthma, in contrast to skin symptoms, showed a significant association with IgE-mediated allergy to NRL.

CONCLUSIONS

Swedish dentists show good compliance with the recommendations for routine glove use. Intolerance reactions are frequently reported, especially by dentists with hand eczema, which emphasizes the need for preventive skin care programmes. Glove-related symptoms from mucous membranes showed a higher association with IgE-mediated allergy to NRL than reported itching of the skin, a fact that should be considered when composing screening questionnaires for NRL sensitization

摘要

背景

在20世纪80年代,几个国家的卫生当局建议在牙科诊疗中常规佩戴手套。然而,长时间使用手套会引发刺激性和过敏性副作用。

目的

调查瑞典牙医使用手套的程度以及自我报告的手套不耐受反应,并研究在接触防护手套时报告有快速瘙痒症状的受试者中,免疫球蛋白E(IgE)介导的对天然橡胶乳胶(NRL)过敏的发生情况。

对象/方法:3500名持照牙医中有3083人回复了邮政问卷,回复率为88%。在报告因手套导致手部快速瘙痒的牙医中,170人中有131人参加了临床检查,包括针对IgE介导过敏的皮肤点刺试验(SPT)和血清学检查(RAST)。

结果

73%的牙医报告每天使用手套超过2小时,48%的牙医每天使用超过6小时,6%的牙医报告不使用手套。NRL手套使用最为频繁(P<0.001),且是引发症状的主要材料(P<0.001)。女性牙医报告使用手套比男性更频繁,年轻牙医(P<0.001)比年长牙医更频繁。女性也更喜欢乙烯基手套。723名(23%)牙医报告有手套不耐受反应,[女性为28%,男性为21%(P<0.001)],且在年轻牙医中更常见。在去年报告有手部湿疹的417名牙医中,54%报告有手套不耐受,而无手部湿疹的牙医中这一比例为20%(P<0.001)。一项包括手部湿疹、年龄、性别和特应性的逻辑回归分析表明,所有这些因素均显著增加手套不耐受风险,且手部湿疹是比特应性更强的因素。在131名因报告与手套相关瘙痒而接受检查的牙医中,15人(11%)经SPT和/或RAST证实有乳胶过敏。与皮肤症状相比,与手套相关的结膜炎、鼻炎和哮喘与IgE介导的对NRL过敏有显著关联。

结论

瑞典牙医对常规使用手套的建议依从性良好。经常报告有不耐受反应,尤其是有手部湿疹的牙医,这凸显了开展预防性皮肤护理项目的必要性。与手套相关的黏膜症状与IgE介导的对NRL过敏的关联高于报告的皮肤瘙痒,在编制NRL致敏筛查问卷时应考虑这一事实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验