Field E A
Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, UK.
Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Mar;38(3):132-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05678.x.
A study was conducted to assess the significance of a personal history of atopy and other risk factors for UK dentists reporting an adverse reaction to natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves. 2535 dentists completed a self-administered questionnaire and, of these, 1034 (group 1) reported an adverse reaction to NRL gloves and 1501 (group 2) did not. Risk factors investigated were: sex, years in clinical practice, exposure to gloves and a history of atopy or food allergy. The signs and symptoms reported by group 1 dentists were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify a set of risk factors that produced the most discrete model for a dentist reporting an adverse reaction to NRL gloves. A personal history of atopy was a significant risk factor. Dentists with a history of eczema and hand eczema in childhood were most likely to report an adverse reaction to NRL gloves.
开展了一项研究,以评估特应性个人病史及其他风险因素对英国牙医报告天然橡胶乳胶(NRL)手套不良反应的影响。2535名牙医完成了一份自填式问卷,其中1034人(第1组)报告对NRL手套有不良反应,1501人(第2组)没有。调查的风险因素包括:性别、临床执业年限、手套接触情况以及特应性或食物过敏史。记录了第1组牙医报告的体征和症状。采用逻辑回归分析来确定一组风险因素,这些因素能为报告对NRL手套有不良反应的牙医产生最离散的模型。特应性个人病史是一个显著的风险因素。童年有湿疹和手部湿疹病史的牙医最有可能报告对NRL手套有不良反应。