Sakai H, Ingenito E P, Mora R, Abbay S, Cavalcante F S, Lutchen K R, Suki B
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Aug;91(2):737-47. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.2.737.
We measured lung impedance in rats in closed chest (CC), open chest (OC), and isolated lungs (IL) at four transpulmonary pressures with a optimal ventilator waveform. Data were analyzed with an homogeneous linear or an inhomogeneous linear model. Both models include tissue damping and elastance and airway inertance. The homogeneous linear model includes airway resistance (Raw), whereas the inhomogeneous linear model has a continuous distribution of Raw characterized by the mean Raw and the standard deviation of Raw (SDR). Lung mechanics were compared with tissue strip mechanics at frequencies and operating stresses comparable to those during lung impedance measurements. The hysteresivity (eta) was calculated as tissue damping/elastance. We found that 1) airway and tissue parameters were different in the IL than in the CC and OC conditions; 2) SDR was lowest in the IL; and 3) eta in IL at low transpulmonary pressure was similar to eta in the tissue strip. We conclude that eta is primarily determined by lung connective tissue, and its elevated estimates from impedance data in the CC and OC conditions are a consequence of compartment-like heterogeneity being greater in CC and OC conditions than in the IL.
我们使用最佳通气波形,在四种跨肺压力下测量了大鼠在闭胸(CC)、开胸(OC)和离体肺(IL)状态下的肺阻抗。数据采用齐次线性模型或非齐次线性模型进行分析。两种模型均包括组织阻尼和弹性以及气道惯性。齐次线性模型包括气道阻力(Raw),而非齐次线性模型具有以平均Raw和Raw的标准差(SDR)为特征的连续Raw分布。在与肺阻抗测量期间相当的频率和操作应力下,将肺力学与组织条力学进行了比较。迟滞性(eta)计算为组织阻尼/弹性。我们发现:1)IL中的气道和组织参数与CC和OC条件下不同;2)IL中的SDR最低;3)低跨肺压力下IL中的eta与组织条中的eta相似。我们得出结论,eta主要由肺结缔组织决定,在CC和OC条件下从阻抗数据得出的eta升高估计值是由于CC和OC条件下比IL中隔室样异质性更大。