Suppr超能文献

临床局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后特定时代的无生化复发生存率。

Era specific biochemical recurrence-free survival following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

作者信息

Han M, Partin A W, Piantadosi S, Epstein J I, Walsh P C

机构信息

Departments of Urology, Oncology Biostatistics and Pathology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2001 Aug;166(2):416-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We retrospectively reviewed a large series of men with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent surgery to define the extent of stage migration and its influence on biochemical recurrence in 3 different eras of prostate cancer management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 2,370 men were treated with radical prostatectomy from 1982 to 1998. We analyzed the freedom from biochemical (prostate specific antigen) progression after radical prostatectomy. We compared the distribution of pathological stage by the year of surgery. We then compared the biochemical recurrence-free survival rate according to the different eras that reflect a change in prostate cancer management.

RESULTS

There was a significant downward stage migration of prostate cancer and an increasing proportion of men who presented with organ confined disease in recent years. The actuarial biochemical recurrence-free rate was significantly different for patients who underwent surgery between 1982 and 1988, compared with those between 1989 and 1998 (p <0.001). These changes may have reflected the benefits of early detection with prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination, better preoperative selection of patients for surgery as well as the effect of lead time.

CONCLUSIONS

Widespread early detection programs for prostate cancer resulted in downward stage migration in men presenting with prostate cancer at our institution during the last 18 years. Also, we have demonstrated a biochemical recurrence-free survival advantage, probably secondary to an improved therapeutic outcome as well as lead time bias, in men who underwent surgery between 1989 and 1998, compared with those between 1982 and 1988. When trying to compare the efficacy of different treatment modalities for prostate cancer, the era in which patients underwent therapy is an important factor to be considered.

摘要

目的

我们回顾性分析了一大组临床局限性前列腺癌患者,这些患者均接受了手术治疗,以确定在前列腺癌治疗的3个不同时期分期迁移的程度及其对生化复发的影响。

材料与方法

1982年至1998年间共有2370名男性接受了根治性前列腺切除术。我们分析了根治性前列腺切除术后无生化(前列腺特异性抗原)进展的情况。我们比较了手术年份的病理分期分布。然后,我们根据反映前列腺癌治疗变化的不同时期,比较了无生化复发生存率。

结果

近年来前列腺癌出现了显著的分期下移,且呈现器官局限性疾病的男性比例不断增加。1982年至1988年间接受手术的患者与1989年至1998年间接受手术的患者相比,精算无生化复发病率存在显著差异(p<0.001)。这些变化可能反映了前列腺特异性抗原和直肠指检早期检测的益处、术前更好地选择手术患者以及提前期的影响。

结论

在过去18年中,我院广泛开展的前列腺癌早期检测项目导致前列腺癌患者的分期下移。此外,我们还证明,与1982年至1988年间接受手术的男性相比,1989年至1998年间接受手术的男性在无生化复发生存方面具有优势,这可能是治疗效果改善以及提前期偏倚的结果。在比较前列腺癌不同治疗方式的疗效时,患者接受治疗的时期是一个需要考虑的重要因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验