Leclaire R, Fortin L, Lambert R, Bergeron Y M, Rossignol M
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, Sir Mortimer B. Davis, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 1;26(13):1411-6; discussion 1417. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107010-00003.
A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed.
To assess the efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency articular facet denervation for low back pain.
Uncontrolled observational studies in patients with low back pain have reported some benefits from the use of facet joint radiofrequency denervation. Because the efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency had not been clearly shown in previous studies, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of the technique for improving functional disabilities and reduce pain.
For this study, 70 patients with low back pain lasting of more than 3 months duration and a good response after intraarticular facet injections under fluoroscopy were assigned randomly to receive percutaneous radiofrequency articular facet denervation under fluoroscopic guidance or the same procedure without effective denervation (sham therapy). The primary outcomes were functional disabilities, as assessed by the Oswestry and Roland-Morris scales, and pain indicated on a visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included spinal mobility and strength.
At 4 weeks, the Roland-Morris score had improved by a mean of 8.4% in the neurotomy group and 2.2% in the placebo group, showing a treatment effect of 6.2% (P = 0.05). At 4 weeks, no significant treatment effect was reflected in the Oswestry score (0.6% change) or the visual analog pain score (4.2% change). At 12 weeks, neither functional disability, as assessed by the Roland-Morris scale (2.6% change) and Oswestry scale (1.9% change), nor the pain level, as assessed by the visual analog scale (-7.6% change), showed any treatment effect.
Although radiofrequency facet joint denervation may provide some short-term improvement in functional disability among patients with chronic low back pain, the efficacy of this treatment has not been established.
进行了一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验。
评估经皮射频关节突去神经术治疗腰痛的疗效。
对腰痛患者的非对照观察性研究报告了关节突关节射频去神经术的一些益处。由于先前研究中经皮射频的疗效尚未明确显示,因此进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估该技术改善功能障碍和减轻疼痛的疗效。
在本研究中,70例腰痛持续超过3个月且在透视引导下关节突内注射后反应良好的患者被随机分配,在透视引导下接受经皮射频关节突去神经术或相同操作但无有效去神经的假治疗。主要结局是通过Oswestry和Roland-Morris量表评估的功能障碍,以及视觉模拟量表上显示的疼痛。次要结局包括脊柱活动度和力量。
在4周时,神经切断术组的Roland-Morris评分平均提高了8.4%,安慰剂组提高了2.2%,治疗效果为6.2%(P = 0.05)。在4周时,Oswestry评分(变化0.6%)或视觉模拟疼痛评分(变化4.2%)未反映出显著的治疗效果。在12周时,无论是通过Roland-Morris量表(变化2.6%)和Oswestry量表(变化1.9%)评估的功能障碍,还是通过视觉模拟量表(变化-7.6%)评估的疼痛水平,均未显示出任何治疗效果。
尽管射频关节突去神经术可能会使慢性腰痛患者的功能障碍得到一些短期改善,但该治疗方法的疗效尚未得到证实。