Schuhmann M U, Rickels E, Rosahl S K, Schneekloth C G, Samii M
Neurochirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;71(2):182-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.2.182.
Part of the daily routine in neurosurgery is the treatment of emergency room admissions, and acute cases from other departments or from outside hospitals. This acute care is not normally included in performance figures or budget management, nor analysed scientifically in respect of quantity and quality of care provided by neurosurgeons.
Over a 1 year period, all acute care cases managed by two neurosurgical on call teams in a large northern German city, were recorded prospectively on a day by day basis. A large database of 1819 entries was created and analysed using descriptive statistics.
The minimum incidence of patients requiring neurosurgical acute care was estimated to be 75-115/100 000 inhabitants/year. This corresponds to a mean of about 6/day. Only 30% of patients came directly via the emergency room. The fate of 70% of patients depended initially on the "neurosurgical qualification" of primary care doctors and here deficits existed. Although most intracerebral and subarachnoid haemorrhages were managed with the participation of neurosurgeons, they were not involved in the management of most mild and moderate traumatic brain injuries. Within 1 year the additional workload from acute care amounted to 1000 unplanned admissions, 900 acute imaging procedures, and almost 400 emergency operations.
The current policy in public health, which includes cuts in resources, transport facilities, and manpower, is not compatible with the demonstrated extent of acute neurosurgical care. In addition to routine elective work, many extra admissions, evening or night time surgery, and imaging procedures have to be accomplished. An education programme for generalists is required to improve overall patient outcome. These conclusions hold special importance if health authorities wish to not only maintain present standards but aim to improve existing deficits.
神经外科日常工作的一部分是治疗急诊室收治的患者,以及来自其他科室或外院的急症患者。这种急症护理通常不纳入绩效指标或预算管理,也未就神经外科医生提供护理的数量和质量进行科学分析。
在1年的时间里,前瞻性地逐日记录德国北部一个大城市的两个神经外科值班团队处理的所有急症护理病例。创建了一个包含1819条记录的大型数据库,并使用描述性统计进行分析。
估计每年每10万居民中需要神经外科急症护理的患者最低发病率为75 - 115例。这相当于平均每天约6例。只有30%的患者直接通过急诊室前来就诊。70%患者的病情最初取决于初级保健医生的“神经外科资质”,而这方面存在不足。尽管大多数脑内和蛛网膜下腔出血的治疗有神经外科医生参与,但他们并未参与大多数轻度和中度创伤性脑损伤的治疗。1年内,急症护理带来的额外工作量包括1000例计划外入院、900次急症影像学检查以及近400台急诊手术。
当前公共卫生政策包括资源、交通设施和人力的削减,这与已证实的神经外科急症护理范围不相符。除了常规的择期工作外,还必须完成许多额外的入院治疗、夜间手术和影像学检查。需要为全科医生开展教育项目以改善患者的总体预后。如果卫生当局不仅希望维持当前标准,还旨在改善现有不足,那么这些结论具有特别重要的意义。