Esparza J, Carrillo R
Junta Directiva de la Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía, Madrid, España.
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2003 Apr;14(2):81-106.
1)To study the alert system (on call duty) in the Spanish neurosurgical departments and main issues of the emergency neurosurgical attention; 2) To establish common sense criteria for a thorough review of the system; 3) To analyse the effects of the current alert system on neurosurgical planning in Spain from the point of view of aging of Spanish neurosurgeons.
An interview containing 11 items related to the main aspects of the alert system was developed. The interview was sent to 51 departments. Answer from 42 of them were received. Neurosurgical departments were categorized in two different patterns to analyse the results: 1 st )according to the size of the staff. Three different types were observed:Type A (more than 10 neurosurgeons);Type B (between 6 and 10), and Type C (less than 6). 2 nd ) according to qualification of the personnel receiving the patient in the emergency area:Type I (the patient is received by paramedic personnel);Type II (trainee sends patient to specialist);Type III (training doctor orders diagnostic procedures) and Type IV (neurosurgeon orders diagnostic procedures and decides next actions).
Type A departments :This group is formed by 8 departments. Alerts are always mix (at home or in hospital). There are usually 3 neurosurgeons on call (sometimes 4). Staff personnel is on call duty at the hospital 5 days a month plus 5-6 days at home. In 38% of the hospitals, department is type I-II (the patient is initially attended by paramedic personnel, not responsible for diagnostic or treatment). Surgical emergencies account for 0.54 a day as a rule and 12.75 patients require neurosurgeon's attention every day. In 75% of the hospital the neurosurgeon must also read neuroimaging procedures and suture scalps in 37%. Next day, neurosurgeon on call is off duty almost routinely. Type B :it was formed by 21 services. Alert are always mix (at home or in hospital). There are usually two neurosurgeons on call. Staff personnel are on call 4-5 days a month at the hospital and 5-6 days at home. The patient is initially attended by a doctor starting diagnosis in 85% of the cases (types III and IV).They operate 0.52 times a day,attending 6.19 patients/day as a mean. Neurosurgeon must read neuroimaging procedures in 57%. They do not repair scalps (except for a 5%) and personnel is off duty next day routinely. Type C :Nine (9) departments were grouped under this lining. Staff is always on call at home. There is usually only one neurosurgeon (sometimes two). Staff perform 10-12 alerts at home along the month. In 4 of the departments they must duplicate the number of days as far as there are two of them on-call. Patients are attended initially as type III-IV in 100% of the cases (doctor asks for diagnostic tools and decides therapy in 78%). Neurosurgeon on-call receives 4-5 phone-calls a day. Surgical emergencies account for 0.34 a day and 1.84 patients a day are attended directly by them. They never suture scalps. They seldom are off-duty next day. Aging of the Spanish neurosurgeons (389 interviewed). Most important issues are: 152 neurosurgeons will be 55 yo between 2003 and 2008, so they can ask for leaving on-call duties. 121 neurosurgeons will be 65 yo between 2009 and 2013.
1 st ) Alert system, mostly in bigger departments, is disproportioned and does not to fit to reality. 2 nd ) Emergency is worse organized in bigger hospitals. Besides, neurosurgeon on-call is not properly consulted. 3 rd ) Almost routinely neurosurgeons are offduty the day after alert in hospital. 4 th ) 152 neurosurgeons are necessary in the next five years to maintain the current system, which is obviously unviable. 5 th ) Most of the finishing trainees (residents) should tolerate "on-call contracts"in bigger departments to sustain the actual system. 6 th )For future planning, Neurosurgical National Committee must offer 20 training places a year to fill jubilees to happen from 2009 on. Finally we believe that the current alert system cannot be maintained any more, so Health Administratt system cannot be maintained any more, so Health Administrations must develop a profound reform. In this sense, the role that Local Neurosurgical Societies must play is essential.
1)研究西班牙神经外科科室的值班制度(随叫随到值班)以及急诊神经外科护理的主要问题;2)制定全面审查该制度的共识标准;3)从西班牙神经外科医生老龄化的角度分析当前值班制度对西班牙神经外科手术规划的影响。
设计了一份包含11个与值班制度主要方面相关条目的访谈问卷。该问卷被发送至51个科室。共收到42个科室的回复。神经外科科室被分为两种不同模式以分析结果:1)根据工作人员规模。观察到三种不同类型:A类(超过10名神经外科医生);B类(6至10名),C类(少于6名)。2)根据急诊区域接收患者的人员资质:I类(患者由护理人员接收);II类(实习医生将患者转交给专科医生);III类(培训医生下达诊断程序)和IV类(神经外科医生下达诊断程序并决定下一步行动)。
A类科室:该组由8个科室组成。警报总是混合的(在家或在医院)。通常有3名神经外科医生值班(有时4名)。工作人员每月在医院值班5天,在家值班5 - 6天。在38%的医院中,科室属于I - II类(患者最初由护理人员接待,不负责诊断或治疗)。通常每天有0.54例外科急诊,每天有12.75名患者需要神经外科医生关注。在75%的医院中,神经外科医生还必须解读神经影像检查结果,37%的情况需要缝合头皮。第二天,值班神经外科医生几乎照例休息。B类:由21个科室组成。警报总是混合的(在家或在医院)。通常有两名神经外科医生值班。工作人员每月在医院值班4 - 5天,在家值班5 - 6天。在85%的病例中(III类和IV类),患者最初由开始诊断的医生接待。他们每天手术0.52次,平均每天接待6.19名患者。57%的情况下神经外科医生必须解读神经影像检查结果。他们不缝合头皮(除了5%的情况),工作人员第二天照例休息。C类:9个科室归为此类。工作人员总是在家值班。通常只有一名神经外科医生(有时两名)。工作人员每月在家执行10 - 12次警报任务。在其中4个科室,如果有两名医生值班,他们必须翻倍值班天数。100%的病例中患者最初按III - IV类接待(78%的情况医生要求进行诊断工具检查并决定治疗方案)。值班神经外科医生每天接到4 - 5个电话。每天有0.34例外科急诊,他们每天直接接待1.84名患者。他们从不缝合头皮。他们第二天很少休息。西班牙神经外科医生的老龄化(访谈了389名)。最重要的问题是:152名神经外科医生将在2003年至2008年期间年满55岁,因此他们可以要求免除值班职责。121名神经外科医生将在2009年至2013年期间年满65岁。
1)值班制度,主要在较大科室中,比例失调且不符合实际情况。2)较大医院的急诊组织更差。此外,未充分征求值班神经外科医生的意见。3)几乎照例,医院值班后的第二天神经外科医生休息。4)未来五年需要152名神经外科医生来维持当前系统,这显然不可行。5)大多数即将完成培训的住院医生在较大科室应接受“值班合同”,以维持现有系统。6)为未来规划,国家神经外科委员会每年必须提供20个培训名额,以填补2009年起出现的空缺。最后我们认为当前的值班制度无法再维持下去,因此卫生管理系统也无法再维持下去,所以卫生管理部门必须进行深刻改革。从这个意义上说,地方神经外科学会必须发挥的作用至关重要。