Kessler R, Faller M, Weitzenblum E, Chaouat A, Aykut A, Ducoloné A, Ehrhart M, Oswald-Mammosser M
Service de Pneumologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires, Hôpital du Hautepierre, 67 200 Strasbourg, France.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul 15;164(2):219-24. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.2.2006129.
The prognostic value and the evolution of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with markedly hypoxemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), treated or not with long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), has been extensively investigated. However, little is known in patients with mildly or moderately hypoxemic COPD not requiring LTOT. Therefore, we assessed the evolution of pulmonary hemodynamics in 131 patients with stable COPD by performing two right heart catheterizations at a mean (+/- SD) time interval of 6.8 +/- 2.9 yr. At inclusion (T0), no patient had PH (i.e., the mean pulmonary artery pressure [Ppa] at rest was < 20 mm Hg). Group 1 included 55 patients without exercising PH and group 2 included 76 patients with exercising PH, defined by a pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa) > 30 mm Hg during a steady-state 40-W exercise. Group 2 patients compared with group 1 patients had a significantly higher resting Ppa (16 +/- 3 mm Hg versus 14 +/- 2 mm Hg, p = 0.001). At the second catheterization, 33 (25%) patients (9 of 55 in group 1, 24 of 76 in group 2, p = 0.048) showed a resting Ppa > 20 mm Hg, but PH was generally mild, ranging from 20 to 42.5 mm Hg. The mean Ppa at second evaluation was 16 +/- 5 mm Hg in group 1 and 19 +/- 7 mm Hg in group 2 (p = 0.01). The patients who developed resting PH at the second catheterization (T1) had higher resting and exercising Ppa (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), and significantly lower resting and exercising Pa(O(2)) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.012, respectively) at T0. Logistic regression analysis showed that resting and exercising Ppa were independent predictors (at T0) for the subsequent development of PH (p = 0.029 and p = 0.027, respectively). The patients who developed resting PH (T1) had a significantly worsening of Pa(O(2)) (from 63.5 mm Hg at T0 to 60 mm Hg at T1, p = 0.047), whereas the Pa(O(2)) as a mean was stable in the remainder (69.5 mm Hg at T0 and T1). These results show the following. The progression of Ppa over time in patients with COPD with mild to moderate hypoxemia is rather slow, the average change for the group as a whole being of + 0.4 mm Hg/yr. Only about 25% of patients with COPD with mild to moderate hypoxemia and without resting PH at the onset will develop PH during a 6-yr follow-up. The patients with exercising PH at the onset have a significantly increased risk of developing PH over time. Only resting and exercising Ppa at the onset are independently related to the subsequent development of PH. However, in individual cases, the models of linear or logistic regression do not allow a pertinent prediction of the level of Ppa or the presence of PH at the second right heart catheterization.
对显著低氧的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者,无论是否接受长期氧疗(LTOT),肺动脉高压(PH)的预后价值及演变情况已得到广泛研究。然而,对于轻度或中度低氧且无需LTOT的COPD患者,相关情况却知之甚少。因此,我们通过在平均(±标准差)6.8±2.9年的时间间隔内进行两次右心导管检查,评估了131例稳定期COPD患者的肺血流动力学演变情况。纳入研究时(T0),无患者存在PH(即静息时平均肺动脉压[Ppa]<20 mmHg)。第1组包括55例无运动性PH的患者,第2组包括76例有运动性PH的患者,运动性PH定义为在稳态40 W运动期间肺动脉压(Ppa)>30 mmHg。与第1组患者相比,第2组患者静息时Ppa显著更高(16±3 mmHg对14±2 mmHg,p = 0.001)。在第二次导管检查时,33例(25%)患者(第1组55例中的9例,第2组76例中的24例,p = 0.048)静息时Ppa>20 mmHg,但PH一般较轻,范围为20至42.5 mmHg。第二次评估时,第1组平均Ppa为16±5 mmHg,第2组为19±7 mmHg(p = 0.01)。在第二次导管检查(T1)时出现静息PH的患者,T0时静息和运动时Ppa更高(分别为p = 0.001和p = 0.002),静息和运动时Pa(O₂)显著更低(分别为p = 0.005和p = 0.012)。逻辑回归分析显示,静息和运动时Ppa是随后发生PH的独立预测因素(T0时,分别为p = 0.029和p = 0.027)。出现静息PH(T1)的患者Pa(O₂)显著恶化(从T0时的63.5 mmHg降至T¹时的60 mmHg,p = 0.047),而其余患者的Pa(O₂)平均值保持稳定(T0和T1时均为69.5 mmHg)。这些结果表明:轻度至中度低氧的COPD患者Ppa随时间的进展相当缓慢,整个组的平均变化为+0.4 mmHg/年。在6年随访期间,只有约25%的轻度至中度低氧且起始时无静息PH的COPD患者会发生PH。起始时有运动性PH的患者随时间发生PH的风险显著增加。只有起始时的静息和运动时Ppa与随后PH的发生独立相关。然而,在个别病例中,线性或逻辑回归模型无法对第二次右心导管检查时的Ppa水平或PH的存在进行恰当预测。