Caruso D A, McIntyre B W
Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Cell Death Differ. 2001 Jul;8(7):665-78. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400865.
STAD cells are the adherent parental apoptotic line from which two sublines were cloned that differed in their response to suspended culturing conditions, one clone STAD.APO is apoptotic and the other STAD.ARR goes into cell cycle arrest. Using this system we have found that the addition of soluble collagen can rescue STAD and STAD.APO cells from anoikis, and it can also affect STAD.ARR cells by overcoming the suspension induced cell cycle arrest. In contrast, when cells were cultured with a soluble anti-beta1 integrin mAb 33B6, the apoptotic clones again were rescued from anoikis, but the cell cycle arresting clone remained quiescent. This result was somewhat surprising as it is generally accepted that cytoskeletal rearrangements that accompany integrin mediated adhesion and cell shape changes are required for the abrogation of anoikis, and it was unexpected that differences in the mechanism used for integrin triggering would yield variable results on growth regulation. This observation led us to further examine whether the addition of a monovalent anti-beta1 integrin agent could produce similar results as intact mAb. Therefore we employed Fab fragments of 33B6 in our culturing assay and found that indeed monovalent binding was capable of saving STAD and STAD.APO cells from anoikis but did not have an effect on STAD.ARR cells. Therefore in this study we have observed that integrin mediated dependent survival can occur by mere ligation of the beta1 integrin subunit, but that cell cycle arrest due to suspended conditions can not. Thus integrins can play differential roles in cell fate decisions and mediate these effects by different mechanisms.
STAD细胞是贴壁的亲代凋亡细胞系,从中克隆出了两个亚系,它们对悬浮培养条件的反应不同,一个克隆STAD.APO具有凋亡特性,另一个STAD.ARR则进入细胞周期停滞状态。利用这个系统,我们发现添加可溶性胶原蛋白可以使STAD和STAD.APO细胞免受失巢凋亡,并且它还可以通过克服悬浮诱导的细胞周期停滞来影响STAD.ARR细胞。相反,当细胞与可溶性抗β1整合素单克隆抗体33B6一起培养时,凋亡克隆再次从失巢凋亡中获救,但细胞周期停滞克隆仍保持静止。这个结果有点令人惊讶,因为人们普遍认为,整合素介导的粘附和细胞形状变化所伴随的细胞骨架重排是消除失巢凋亡所必需的,而且整合素触发机制的差异会对生长调节产生不同结果这一点也出乎意料。这一观察结果促使我们进一步研究添加单价抗β1整合素试剂是否能产生与完整单克隆抗体类似的结果。因此,我们在培养试验中使用了33B6的Fab片段,发现单价结合确实能够使STAD和STAD.APO细胞免受失巢凋亡,但对STAD.ARR细胞没有影响。因此,在本研究中我们观察到,整合素介导的依赖性存活仅通过β1整合素亚基的连接即可发生,但悬浮条件导致的细胞周期停滞则不能。因此,整合素在细胞命运决定中可以发挥不同作用,并通过不同机制介导这些作用。