Weisskopf M, Reindl R, Schröder R, Hopfenmüller P, Mittlmeier T
Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Medizinische Fakultät der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsklinikum Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 2001 Jun;10(3):250-6. doi: 10.1007/s005860000208.
Four different radiological diagnostic methods were compared as to their diagnostic relevance in the analysis of odontoid fractures. Thirty-one patients with fresh odontoid fractures were investigated using standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, conventional tomography, axial computerized tomography and two-dimensional reconstruction in the sagittal and the coronal planes. As a control, 13 patients without odontoid fractures were examined. The results of the different investigations were correlated with the actual (clinical and/or intra-operative) findings. The coefficients of correlation for the conventional tomography and two-dimensional reconstruction were kappa=0.774 and kappa=0.907, respectively. For conventional radiography and axial computerized tomography (CT), the coefficients were clearly lower, at kappa=0.364 and kappa=0.627, respectively. The less time-consuming CT examination with sagittal and coronal reconstructions is equivalent with respect to diagnostic accuracy and can, therefore, replace conventional tomography in the evaluation fractures.
比较了四种不同的放射学诊断方法在齿状突骨折分析中的诊断相关性。对31例新鲜齿状突骨折患者进行了标准正位和侧位X线片、传统体层摄影、轴向计算机断层扫描以及矢状面和冠状面二维重建检查。作为对照,对13例无齿状突骨折的患者进行了检查。将不同检查的结果与实际(临床和/或术中)发现进行了关联。传统体层摄影和二维重建的相关系数分别为kappa = 0.774和kappa = 0.907。对于传统X线摄影和轴向计算机断层扫描(CT),相关系数明显较低,分别为kappa = 0.364和kappa = 0.627。耗时较少的带有矢状面和冠状面重建的CT检查在诊断准确性方面相当,因此在评估骨折时可以替代传统体层摄影。