Goldberg S N, Saldinger P F, Gazelle G S, Huertas J C, Stuart K E, Jacobs T, Kruskal J B
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Radiology. 2001 Aug;220(2):420-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.220.2.r01au44420.
To determine whether a combination of intratumoral doxorubicin injection and radio-frequency (RF) ablation increases tumor destruction compared with RF ablation alone in an animal tumor model.
R3230 mammary adenocarcinoma 1.2-1.5-cm- diameter nodules (n = 110) were implanted subcutaneously in 84 female Fischer rats. For initial experiments (n = 46), tumors were treated with (a) conventional, monopolar RF (250 mA +/- 25 [SD] at 70 degrees C +/- 1 for 5 minutes) ablation alone; (b) direct intratumoral doxorubicin injection (volume, 250 microL; total dose, 0.5 mg) alone; (c) combined therapy (doxorubicin injection immediately followed by RF ablation); (d) RF ablation and injection of 250 microL of distilled water; or (e) no treatment. In subsequent experiments, amount of doxorubicin (0.02-2.50 mg; n = 40 additional tumors) and timing of doxorubicin administration (2 days before to 2 days after RF ablation; n = 24 more tumors) were varied. Pathologic examination, including staining for mitochondrial enzyme activity and perfusion, was performed, and the resultant tumor destruction from each treatment was evaluated.
Coagulation diameter was 6.7 mm +/- 0.6 for tumors treated with RF ablation alone and 6.9 mm +/- 0.7 for those treated with RF ablation and water (P =.52), while intratumoral doxorubicin injection alone produced only 2.0-3.0 mm of coagulation (P <.001). Increased coagulation was observed only with combined doxorubicin injection and RF therapy (P <.001). Coagulation was dependent on concentration and timing of doxorubicin administration, with greatest coagulation (11.5 mm +/- 1.1) observed for doxorubicin administered within 30 minutes of RF ablation.
Adjuvant intratumoral doxorubicin injection increases coagulation in solid tumors compared with RF ablation alone. Increased tumor destruction is also seen when doxorubicin is administered after RF ablation, which suggests that RF ablation may sensitize tumors to chemotherapy. Such combination therapies may, therefore, offer improved methods for ablating solid tumors.
在动物肿瘤模型中,确定瘤内注射阿霉素与射频(RF)消融联合应用是否比单纯RF消融能增强肿瘤破坏效果。
将直径1.2 - 1.5厘米的R3230乳腺腺癌结节(n = 110)皮下植入84只雌性Fischer大鼠体内。在初始实验(n = 46)中,对肿瘤进行以下处理:(a)单纯常规单极RF(70℃±1℃,250毫安±25[标准差],持续5分钟)消融;(b)单纯瘤内直接注射阿霉素(体积250微升;总剂量0.5毫克);(c)联合治疗(注射阿霉素后立即进行RF消融);(d)RF消融并注射250微升蒸馏水;或(e)不治疗。在后续实验中,改变阿霉素剂量(0.02 - 2.50毫克;另外40个肿瘤)和阿霉素给药时间(RF消融前2天至消融后2天;另外24个肿瘤)。进行病理检查,包括线粒体酶活性染色和灌注检查,并评估每种治疗方法所导致的肿瘤破坏情况。
单纯RF消融治疗的肿瘤凝固直径为6.7毫米±0.6,RF消融并注射水的肿瘤凝固直径为6.9毫米±0.7(P = 0.52),而单纯瘤内注射阿霉素仅产生2.0 - 3.0毫米的凝固(P < 0.001)。仅在阿霉素注射与RF治疗联合应用时观察到凝固增加(P < 0.001)。凝固情况取决于阿霉素给药的浓度和时间,在RF消融后30分钟内给药的阿霉素观察到最大凝固(11.5毫米±1.1)。
与单纯RF消融相比,辅助性瘤内注射阿霉素可增加实体瘤的凝固。在RF消融后给予阿霉素时也可见肿瘤破坏增加,这表明RF消融可能使肿瘤对化疗敏感。因此,这种联合治疗方法可能为实体瘤消融提供更好的方法。