Suppr超能文献

采食不同物理形态青草日粮的绵羊在采食和反刍过程中的能量交换

Energy exchanges associated with eating and rumination in sheep given grass diets of different physical forms.

作者信息

Osuji P O, Gordon J G, Webster J F

出版信息

Br J Nutr. 1975 Jul;34(1):59-71. doi: 10.1017/1s0007114575000098.

Abstract
  1. Energy exchanges and other physiological functions associated with eating and rumination were determined in four experiments. Sheep were given chopped, dried grass (DGC), pelleted, dried grass (DGP) or fresh grass (FGC). 2. In Expt I a preliminary study was made using all three diets. The dry matter (DM) of DGP was eaten significantly faster than that of chopped diets. Sheep salivated most during eating and ruminated longest when given DGC. Rates of contraction for the reticulo-rumen did not differ significantly between diets during idling and rumination, but were significantly faster during eating with DGP. The apparent energy costs of eating were 17, 109 and 176 kJ/kg DM eaten for DGP, DGC and FGC respectively, but these probably underestimated the true energy cost. 3. Expt 2 compared DGP and DGC at two levels of intake. The mean energy costs of eating DGP and DGC were 23.5 and 267 kI/kg DM respectively. The mean energy costs of eating between the energy cost of eating and the duration of the meal. The proportion of time the sheep spent ruminating DGC was about 23% but less than 1% for DGP. There was no significant relationship between heat production and the time spent ruminating. 4. In Expt 3 four sheep were offered fresh grass and, later, an equivalent DM intake after the material had been dried. The sheep ate the dried meal significantly faster. The mean energy costs of eating were 208 and 346 kJ/kg DM for DGC and FGC respectively. In this experiment the sheep ruminated significantly longer when given FGC, and the energy cost of rumination was 0.11 kJ/min. 5. Increases in heat production during and after fistula-feeding only 2-8% of those obtained during eating, indicating that nearly all the increase in heat production during eating could be attributed to the energy cost of eating per se. 6. The contribution of the energy costs of eating and rumination to the heat increment of feeding and the energy requirement for maintenance of sheep are discussed.
摘要
  1. 在四项实验中测定了与采食和反刍相关的能量交换及其他生理功能。给绵羊投喂切碎的干草(DGC)、颗粒状干草(DGP)或鲜草(FGC)。2. 在实验1中,使用所有三种日粮进行了一项初步研究。DGP的干物质(DM)采食速度明显快于切碎日粮的干物质。给绵羊投喂DGC时,它们在采食过程中唾液分泌最多,反刍时间最长。在反刍和闲居期间,不同日粮之间瘤网胃的收缩率没有显著差异,但在采食DGP时收缩率明显更快。采食的表观能量成本分别为:DGP为17 kJ/kg DM、DGC为109 kJ/kg DM、FGC为176 kJ/kg DM,但这些可能低估了真实的能量成本。3. 实验2在两个采食量水平上比较了DGP和DGC。采食DGP和DGC的平均能量成本分别为23.5 kJ/kg DM和267 kJ/kg DM。采食的平均能量成本介于采食的能量成本和采食持续时间之间。绵羊反刍DGC的时间比例约为23%,但反刍DGP的时间比例不到1%。产热量与反刍时间之间没有显著关系。4. 在实验3中,给四只绵羊投喂鲜草,之后在草料干燥后投喂等量的干物质采食量。绵羊采食干制草料的速度明显更快。采食DGC和FGC的平均能量成本分别为208 kJ/kg DM和346 kJ/kg DM。在该实验中,给绵羊投喂FGC时,它们反刍的时间明显更长,反刍的能量成本为0.11 kJ/分钟。5. 通过瘘管饲喂期间及之后的产热量增加仅为采食期间产热量增加的2 - 8%,这表明采食期间产热量的几乎所有增加都可归因于采食本身的能量成本。6. 讨论了采食和反刍的能量成本对采食热增量和绵羊维持能量需求的贡献。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验