Suppr超能文献

出生至1800克早产儿辐射保暖台与暖箱护理的临床比较

A clinical comparison of radiant warmer and incubator care for preterm infants from birth to 1800 grams.

作者信息

Meyer M P, Payton M J, Salmon A, Hutchinson C, de Klerk A

机构信息

Neonatal Unit, Paediatrics and Child Health, Middlemore Hospital and the University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):395-401. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.395.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare radiant warmer and incubator care for preterm infants from birth with respect to temperature control and weight gain.

METHODS

Sixty preterm infants <33 weeks' gestation were randomized at birth to radiant warmer or incubator care. The initial goal was to maintain abdominal temperature at 36.8 degrees C in both groups and axillary temperature at 36.8 to 37.3 degrees C; air servocontrol was used for incubator infants. Infants in both groups received added humidity for 5 days if their weight was <1000 g and for 3 days if they weighed between 1000 and 1249 g. During a 3-hour period on days 1 to 7, recordings of abdominal, forehead, and foot temperatures were obtained. The percentage of the recording time during which the abdominal temperature was in the target range of between 36 degrees C and 37.5 degrees C was determined as an indicator of temperature control. Weight gain from birth to 1800 g was compared. Secondary outcomes included fluid balance and clinical events.

RESULTS

There were 30 infants in each group; 48 were <1500 g (of whom 17 were <1000 g). There were no significant differences in birth weight, gestation, gender, or illness severity scores in the 2 groups. Significant differences in temperature control were noted on day 1. Although admission temperatures were similar, lower abdominal temperatures were noted in the first 2 hours of life in the incubator group (medians were 36.6 degrees C and 35.9 degrees C in the radiant warmer and incubator groups, respectively). Similarly, mean abdominal temperatures during the 3-hour recording on day 1 were lower in the incubator group, and infants in this group spent a significantly greater percentage of the recording time with temperatures outside the target range (17.3% compared with 0.88%). Other temperature recordings from the forehead and foot were not significantly different in the groups. Fluid intakes were higher for infants under radiant warmer on days 2, 3, and 4, and the difference amounted to a mean of 12.8 mL/kg/d. Maximum sodium levels in the first week were similar in the 2 groups. Mean weight gain was 17.4 g/kg/d for the radiant warmer group and 17.1 g/kg/d for the incubator group; days to regain birth weight and length of hospital stay were not significantly different. Greater numbers of infants in the radiant warmer group required phototherapy, and adverse events (which included death, necrotizing enterocolitis, chronic lung disease, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, or retinopathy requiring laser treatment) were less frequent in the radiant warmer group (1 infant compared with 8 in the incubator group; relative risk 0.1; 95% confidence intervals: 0.01-0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown differences in abdominal temperatures on day 1 and outcome, although the latter finding should be viewed with caution because of the sample size. The results indicate benefits for the initial use of the radiant warmer after birth. Although fluid requirements were higher in the radiant warmer group for days 2 through 4, the increased fluid volumes were given without apparent adverse effect.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较出生后对早产儿采用辐射保暖台和暖箱护理在体温控制和体重增加方面的效果。

方法

60例孕周<33周的早产儿在出生时被随机分为辐射保暖台护理组或暖箱护理组。初始目标是两组均将腹部温度维持在36.8℃,腋窝温度维持在36.8至37.3℃;暖箱内的婴儿采用空气伺服控制。两组中体重<1000g的婴儿接受5天的额外湿度护理,体重在1000至1249g之间的婴儿接受3天的额外湿度护理。在第1至7天的3小时时间段内,记录腹部、前额和足部温度。将腹部温度处于36℃至37.5℃目标范围内的记录时间百分比作为体温控制的指标。比较出生至体重达到1800g时的体重增加情况。次要结局包括液体平衡和临床事件。

结果

每组有30例婴儿;48例体重<1500g(其中17例体重<1000g)。两组在出生体重、孕周、性别或疾病严重程度评分方面无显著差异。在第1天观察到体温控制存在显著差异。尽管入院时体温相似,但暖箱护理组在出生后最初2小时的腹部温度较低(辐射保暖台组和暖箱护理组的中位数分别为36.6℃和35.9℃)。同样,在第1天的3小时记录期间,暖箱护理组的平均腹部温度较低,且该组婴儿在记录时间内体温超出目标范围的百分比显著更高(分别为17.3%和0.88%)。两组在前额和足部的其他温度记录无显著差异。辐射保暖台护理组的婴儿在第2、3和4天的液体摄入量较高,差异平均为12.8mL/kg/d。两组在第一周的最高钠水平相似。辐射保暖台组的平均体重增加为17.4g/kg/d,暖箱护理组为17.1g/kg/d;恢复出生体重的天数和住院时间无显著差异。辐射保暖台组需要光疗的婴儿数量更多,辐射保暖台组的不良事件(包括死亡、坏死性小肠结肠炎、慢性肺病、3级或4级脑室内出血、脑室周围白质软化或需要激光治疗的视网膜病变)发生率较低(辐射保暖台组1例婴儿,暖箱护理组8例婴儿;相对危险度0.1;95%置信区间:0.01 - 0.82)。

结论

本研究显示了第1天腹部温度和结局存在差异,不过由于样本量的原因,后一发现应谨慎看待。结果表明出生后最初使用辐射保暖台有益。尽管辐射保暖台组在第2至4天的液体需求量较高,但增加的液体量并未产生明显不良影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验