Suppr超能文献

使用混合式湿化培养箱改善极早产儿的照护和生长结局。

Improved care and growth outcomes by using hybrid humidified incubators in very preterm infants.

机构信息

Division of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):e137-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2997. Epub 2009 Dec 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify changes in temperature, fluid and electrolyte management, growth, and short-term outcome in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants nursed in humidified hybrid incubators (HI group) compared with a cohort of patients cared for in nonhumidified conventional incubators (CI group).

METHODS

Body temperature (BT), fluid and electrolyte balance, and growth velocity (GV) were collected retrospectively on 182 ELBW infants. The CI group included ELBW infants cared for with radiant warmers followed by an incubator without humidity. The HI group included ELBW infants cared for in the radiant warmer mode in a Giraffe OmniBed, followed by the incubator mode using high humidity.

RESULTS

The CI group included more multiple births (50.6%) than the HI group (35.8%; P < .05), but there was no difference in demographic characteristics. BT was similar during the first week. The HI group had less fluid intake, urine output, and insensible water loss, less maximum weight loss, and a lower incidence of hypernatremia during the first week than did the CI group (P < .05). The HI group also had a lower frequency of electrolyte sampling and packed red cell transfusion (P < .05), a higher incidence of hyponatremia on postnatal day 1 than the CI group (P < .05), and a higher GV than the CI group (15.2 +/- 5.0 vs 13.5 +/- 4.8 g/kg per day), especially among those with a birth weight of <or=749 g (P < .01). There was no difference in sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, and all bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), but there was a decreased incidence of severe BPD (5.1% [HI] vs 16.4% [CI]; P < .05) and duration of assisted ventilation in the HI group compared with the CI group (15.5 +/- 2.1 vs 19.6 +/- 2.4 days, respectively; P = .068).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a humidified hybrid incubator improved care for ELBW infants by making it possible to decrease fluid intake, improve electrolyte balance, and enhance GV without a disturbance of BT compared with conventional care. By adjusting fluid intake when using these devices, benefits may be enhanced and the risk of BPD and severe BPD may be reduced.

摘要

目的

比较经加湿混合式培养箱(HI 组)和非加湿传统培养箱(CI 组)护理的极低出生体重儿(ELBW)的体温、液体和电解质管理、生长和短期结局的变化。

方法

回顾性收集了 182 例 ELBW 婴儿的体温(BT)、液体和电解质平衡以及生长速度(GV)数据。CI 组包括接受辐射保暖器治疗后再转入无加湿功能培养箱的 ELBW 婴儿。HI 组包括在长颈鹿 OmniBed 辐射保暖器模式下接受治疗,然后转入高湿度培养箱模式的 ELBW 婴儿。

结果

CI 组的多胎分娩比例(50.6%)高于 HI 组(35.8%;P <.05),但两组的人口统计学特征无差异。在第一周,两组的 BT 相似。HI 组的液体摄入量、尿量和不显性失水量较少,最大体重减轻较少,且第一周的高钠血症发生率较低(P <.05)。HI 组的电解质采样和输红细胞的频率较低(P <.05),出生后第 1 天的低钠血症发生率高于 CI 组(P <.05),GV 高于 CI 组(15.2 +/- 5.0 比 13.5 +/- 4.8 g/kg/天),特别是出生体重 <or=749 g 的婴儿(P <.01)。两组的败血症、坏死性小肠结肠炎、颅内出血和所有支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的发生率无差异,但 HI 组严重 BPD 的发生率(5.1% [HI] 比 16.4% [CI];P <.05)和辅助通气时间(15.5 +/- 2.1 比 19.6 +/- 2.4 天,P =.068)均低于 CI 组。

结论

与传统护理相比,使用加湿混合式培养箱可减少液体摄入,改善电解质平衡,提高 GV,同时不干扰 BT,从而改善 ELBW 婴儿的护理。通过调整这些设备的液体摄入量,可能会提高疗效,并降低 BPD 和严重 BPD 的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验