Desposito F, Lloyd-Puryear M A, Tonniges T F, Rhein F, Mann M
Center for Human and Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey 07103, USA.
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):E22. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.e22.
Mandated state newborn screening programs for the approximately 4 million infants born each year in the United States involves the following 5 components: 1) initial screening, 2) immediate follow-up testing of the screen-positive newborn, 3) diagnosis confirmation (true positive versus false positive), 4) immediate and long-term care, and 5) evaluation of all of the components of the system, including process and outcomes measures. Smooth functioning of this system requires pretest education of the parents as well as education and involvement of all health care providers who interact with the newborn screening system. Although extensive literature is available concerning public health aspects, technical standards/protocols, and discussion of the interfaces among the 5 components of the system, little information is available regarding physician awareness, involvement, and interactions with the system. The objective of this study was to determine, through a survey, primary care pediatricians' satisfaction with their state's newborn screening program. This was reflected in survey questions that asked how pediatricians were notified of the results of newborn screening tests that were performed on infants in their practice.
Two thousand questionnaires were sent to primary care pediatricians in all 50 states and the District of Columbia regarding their practices in retrieving statewide newborn screening results. Of the 2000 surveys, 574 (29%) responses from primary care pediatricians who care for at least 1 to 5 newborns each week form the basis of this report. Also reported are the commentaries of the physicians concerning their specific practices, overall assessment of the system, and ideas for improvement.
Physicians reported their general satisfaction with the newborn screening system's ability to retrieve screen-positive infants for follow-up testing. However, communication and partnership with the primary care pediatrician regarding accessibility and timely retrieval of newborn screening test results was deemed less than optimal. Thirty-one percent of respondents indicated that notification for screen-positive test results was greater than 10 days, whereas 26% indicated that they do not receive the results of screen-negative tests and need to develop office procedures (contact birth hospital or state laboratory) to obtain results. Twenty-eight percent indicated that they do not actively seek results of newborn screening for their patients and presume that "no news is good news." Barriers to retrieving test results included that infants were born at hospitals where the physician does not have privileges, there were new transfers to the practice, infants were born in other states, personnel time was needed to track results, and there was a lack of a cohesive communication/reporting system that includes the primary care physician as an integral partner in the newborn screening communication process. Ninety-two percent of physicians would welcome an enhanced state system with direct communication to the primary care pediatrician as well as the birth hospital.
Pediatricians recognize and endorse the benefits of newborn screening and believe that they play an important role in the efficient functioning of the system. An enhanced physician partnership with the newborn screening program will enable the timely follow-up of the screen-positive newborn for confirmatory testing. All test results need to be communicated to the pediatrician in a timely and efficient manner: 7 days for screen-positive results and 10 to 14 days for all results. Newborn screening test results of new patients who enter the practice should be available at the time of the first well-infant visit, ideally by 2 weeks of age. The majority of primary care pediatricians acknowledge the need to establish office protocols for the retrieval of newborn screening test results and would welcome an enhanced direct communication system with the state newborn screening program.
美国每年约400万新生儿的法定州级新生儿筛查项目包含以下5个组成部分:1)初始筛查;2)对筛查呈阳性的新生儿进行即时后续检测;3)确诊(真阳性与假阳性);4)即时和长期护理;5)对系统的所有组成部分进行评估,包括过程和结果指标。该系统的平稳运行需要对家长进行检测前教育,以及所有与新生儿筛查系统有互动的医疗服务提供者的教育和参与。尽管有大量关于公共卫生方面、技术标准/协议以及系统5个组成部分之间接口讨论的文献,但关于医生对该系统的认知、参与情况及互动的信息却很少。本研究的目的是通过一项调查,确定基层儿科医生对其所在州新生儿筛查项目的满意度。这体现在调查问题中,即询问儿科医生是如何得知在其诊所接受新生儿筛查检测的婴儿的结果的。
向美国50个州和哥伦比亚特区的基层儿科医生发送了2000份问卷,询问他们获取全州新生儿筛查结果的做法。在这2000份调查问卷中,每周至少照顾1至5名新生儿的基层儿科医生的574份(29%)回复构成了本报告的基础。还报告了医生们关于其具体做法、对系统的总体评估以及改进建议的评论。
医生们报告了他们对新生儿筛查系统找回筛查呈阳性婴儿进行后续检测能力的总体满意度。然而,在获取新生儿筛查检测结果的可及性和及时性方面,与基层儿科医生的沟通和合作被认为不尽如人意。31%的受访者表示,筛查呈阳性检测结果的通知时间超过10天,而26%的受访者表示他们没有收到筛查呈阴性检测结果,需要制定办公室程序(联系出生医院或州实验室)来获取结果。28%的受访者表示他们不会主动为患者查询新生儿筛查结果,并认为“没有消息就是好消息”。获取检测结果的障碍包括婴儿在医生没有特权资格的医院出生、有新患者转入诊所、婴儿在其他州出生、需要工作人员花费时间追踪结果,以及缺乏一个将基层医生作为新生儿筛查沟通流程中不可或缺的合作伙伴的连贯沟通/报告系统。92%的医生欢迎一个加强后的州级系统,该系统能直接与基层儿科医生以及出生医院进行沟通。
儿科医生认识到并认可新生儿筛查的益处,并认为他们在系统的有效运行中发挥着重要作用。加强医生与新生儿筛查项目的合作将能及时对筛查呈阳性的新生儿进行后续确诊检测。所有检测结果都需要及时、高效地传达给儿科医生:筛查呈阳性结果需在7天内传达,所有结果需在10至14天内传达。新进入诊所的患者的新生儿筛查检测结果应在首次健康婴儿就诊时即可获取,理想情况下在2周龄时就能获取。大多数基层儿科医生承认需要制定办公室程序来获取新生儿筛查检测结果,并欢迎一个加强后的与州新生儿筛查项目的直接沟通系统。