Hollar David W
School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Mar 16;7:3. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-3.
The development and implementation of electronic health records (EHR) have occurred slowly in the United States. To date, these approaches have, for the most part, followed four developmental tracks: (a) Enhancement of immunization registries and linkage with other health records to produce Child Health Profiles (CHP), (b) Regional Health Information Organization (RHIO) demonstration projects to link together patient medical records, (c) Insurance company projects linked to ICD-9 codes and patient records for cost-benefit assessments, and (d) Consortia of EHR developers collaborating to model systems requirements and standards for data linkage. Until recently, these separate efforts have been conducted in the very silos that they had intended to eliminate, and there is still considerable debate concerning health professionals access to as well as commitment to using EHR if these systems are provided. This paper will describe these four developmental tracks, patient rights and the legal environment for EHR, international comparisons, and future projections for EHR expansion across health networks in the United States.
电子健康记录(EHR)在美国的发展和实施进展缓慢。迄今为止,这些方法大多遵循四条发展路径:(a)加强免疫接种登记并与其他健康记录相链接,以生成儿童健康档案(CHP);(b)区域健康信息组织(RHIO)示范项目,将患者病历链接在一起;(c)与ICD - 9编码和患者记录相关联的保险公司项目,用于成本效益评估;(d)电子健康记录开发者联盟合作,为数据链接制定系统要求和标准模型。直到最近,这些单独的努力仍在它们原本打算消除的各自为政的状态下进行,并且对于如果提供这些系统,卫生专业人员对电子健康记录的获取以及使用意愿仍存在相当大的争议。本文将描述这四条发展路径、电子健康记录的患者权利和法律环境、国际比较以及美国跨健康网络的电子健康记录扩展的未来预测。