Webb Y, Clifford P, Fowler V, Morgan C, Hanson M
Centre for Outcomes, Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College, London, UK.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2000;13(6-7):273-81. doi: 10.1108/09526860010373253.
The implementation of the Care Programme Approach (CPA) in English mental health services has been slow to proceed despite general support, both in England and in other countries, of its principles of good practice. This study set out to evaluate the implementation of the CPA directly from patients' experience using the "Your Treatment and Care" assessment tool. The results of a survey of 503 patients across five NHS Trusts in England showed that many patients did not have a copy of their care plan and had not been involved in the care planning procedure. Many reported shortcomings in their experience of their key worker and their psychiatrist. However, there was substantial variation in experience across services. "Your Treatment and Care" showed good internal reliability, was acceptable to users, and appeared to be able to access actual experiences better than a traditional "satisfaction" item. It appears to be very useful as a benchmarking tool and is now being used in services across the UK, the USA and Australia.
尽管英国和其他国家普遍支持关怀计划模式(CPA)的良好实践原则,但该模式在英国心理健康服务中的实施进展缓慢。本研究旨在使用“你的治疗与关怀”评估工具,直接从患者体验的角度评估CPA的实施情况。对英格兰五个国民健康服务信托基金的503名患者进行的调查结果显示,许多患者没有护理计划副本,也未参与护理计划制定过程。许多患者报告称,他们的关键工作人员和精神科医生存在不足之处。然而,不同服务之间的体验存在很大差异。“你的治疗与关怀”显示出良好的内部可靠性,用户可以接受,并且似乎比传统的“满意度”项目更能反映实际体验。它作为一种基准工具似乎非常有用,目前正在英国、美国和澳大利亚的服务中使用。