Mayer J, Vásová I, Korístek Z, Navrátil M, Klabusay M, Doubek M, Vorlícek J, Cernilová I, Vodvárka P, Petráková K
Department of Internal Medicine-Hematooncology, University Hospital, Brno.
Eur J Haematol Suppl. 2001 Jul;64:21-7.
Treatment of early relapsing or resistant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD) remains problematic. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation improves the prognosis for patients in response following standard dose regimens. We adopted the strategy of using salvage chemotherapy to debulk disease and simultaneously mobilize stem cells. We used regimens based on ifosfamide and etoposide because these drugs are not usually used as the front-line treatment. Twenty-seven patients with NHL received MINE chemotherapy (mesna and ifosfamide 1330 mg/m2 and etoposide 65 mg/m2 i.v. days 1-3, and mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 i.v. day 1). The same schedule, but higher doses were used for PBSC stimulation (mesna, ifosfamide 1700 mg/m2, etoposide 175 mg/m2, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2). Forty-six patients with HD received VIM chemotherapy (mesna, ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v. days 1-5, etoposide 90 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 3, and 5, methotrexate 30 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 5). After both VIM and high dose MINE, chemotherapy for mobilization was followed by G-CSF administered at a dose 5-16 micrograms/kg/day depending on the clinicians judgement of the patient's pretreatment. Complete response after VIM and MINE were 39% and 38%, respectively; partial response (PR) rates were 17% and 29%, and stable disease (SD) 25% and 4%, respectively. In both groups, patients with relapsing disease had better responses than did those with primary progressive disease. Both regimens exhibited excellent mobilizing capacity. We performed 213 aphereses with a median 3 per patient starting on either day 13 as a median for VIM, or on day 12 as a median for MINE. In the majority of patients, the collection started in the time interval median +/- 1 day (n = 62, 85%). The median yields were 10.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and 53.1 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg for VIM, and 13.3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and 54.5 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg for MINE. We collected at least 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in all but six patients (8%), and the harvested amount of CD34+ cells was less than 1.0 x 10(6)/kg in only two patients (3%). The toxicity of VIM and MINE was minimal and chemotherapy-induced trombocytopenia did not occur with PBSC collection.
早期复发或难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)和霍奇金病(HD)的治疗仍然存在问题。大剂量化疗后进行自体外周血干细胞(PBSC)移植可改善患者在标准剂量方案治疗后有反应者的预后。我们采用了挽救性化疗来减少肿瘤负荷并同时动员干细胞的策略。我们使用基于异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷的方案,因为这些药物通常不用于一线治疗。27例NHL患者接受了MINE化疗(美司钠和异环磷酰胺1330mg/m²,依托泊苷65mg/m²静脉滴注第1 - 3天,米托蒽醌8mg/m²静脉滴注第1天)。相同的方案,但更高剂量用于PBSC刺激(美司钠、异环磷酰胺1700mg/m²,依托泊苷175mg/m²,米托蒽醌10mg/m²)。46例HD患者接受了VIM化疗(美司钠、异环磷酰胺1200mg/m²静脉滴注第1 - 5天,依托泊苷90mg/m²静脉滴注第1、3和5天,甲氨蝶呤30mg/m²静脉滴注第1和5天)。在VIM和高剂量MINE化疗后,用于动员的化疗之后根据临床医生对患者预处理情况的判断,以5 - 16微克/千克/天的剂量给予粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)。VIM和MINE后的完全缓解率分别为39%和38%;部分缓解(PR)率分别为17%和29%,疾病稳定(SD)率分别为25%和4%。在两组中,复发患者的反应比原发进展性疾病患者更好。两种方案均表现出出色的动员能力。我们进行了213次单采,每位患者的中位数为3次,VIM组从第13天开始作为中位数,MINE组从第12天开始作为中位数。在大多数患者中,采集在中位数±1天的时间间隔内开始(n = 62,85%)。VIM组的中位数产量为10.6×10⁶个CD34⁺细胞/千克和53.1×10⁴个集落形成单位 - 粒细胞巨噬细胞(CFU - GM)/千克,MINE组为13.3×10⁶个CD34⁺细胞/千克和54.5×10⁴个CFU - GM/千克。除6例患者(8%)外,我们在所有患者中至少采集到2.5×10⁶个CD34⁺细胞/千克,仅2例患者(3%)收获的CD34⁺细胞量小于1.0×10⁶/千克。VIM和MINE的毒性极小,且在进行PBSC采集时未发生化疗诱导的血小板减少症。