Suppr超能文献

一项双盲随机对照试验:1%益康唑乳膏与1%克霉唑乳膏每日两次治疗念珠菌和皮肤癣菌皮肤感染的对比研究。

A double-blind randomized comparative trial: eberconazole 1% cream versus clotrimazole 1% cream twice daily in Candida and dermatophyte skin infections.

作者信息

del Palacio A, Ortiz F J, Pérez A, Pazos C, Garau M, Font E

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Carretera de Andalucia, Km 5.4, E-28041, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2001;44(5):173-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0507.2001.00632.x.

Abstract

In a double-blind phase III study the efficacy and tolerance of eberconazole 1% cream was compared with clotrimazole 1% cream, applied twice daily for four consecutive weeks in 157 patients, with mycologically proven cutaneous candidosis (24 patients, 25 infected sites) and in 133 patients with dermatophyte skin infections (141 treated sites). The analysis was carried out by number of infected and treated sites. The four groups of sites and the distribution of target lesions were similar. The distribution of the sum of clinical scores and infecting organisms were also similar. There were no differences between the groups in terms of the range and mean duration of infection. At the end of therapy and on follow-up in skin candidosis the proportion of patients with effective treatment was 73 and 50% for clotrimazole and eberconazole, respectively. Premature termination due to adverse effects was 26.7% for clotrimazole and 20% for eberconazole. At the end of treatment of dermatophyte infections the proportion of patients with effective treatment was 46% for clotrimazole and 61% for eberconazole. At the overall assessment (6 weeks after the end of treatment) eberconazole was judged effective in 72% of treated sites, whereas clotrimazole was effective in 61%, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.15). There were three relapses (4%) in the clotrimazole-treated group and one relapse (1%) in the eberconazole group. One patient treated with eberconazole cream (1%) had a premature termination due to adverse events attributable to the medication.

摘要

在一项双盲III期研究中,将1%益康唑乳膏的疗效和耐受性与1%克霉唑乳膏进行了比较。157例患者连续四周每天两次外用这两种药物,其中24例患者(25个感染部位)经真菌学证实为皮肤念珠菌病,133例患者(141个治疗部位)为皮肤癣菌感染。分析按感染部位和治疗部位的数量进行。四组部位及靶皮损分布相似。临床评分总和及感染病原体的分布也相似。两组在感染范围和平均持续时间方面无差异。在皮肤念珠菌病治疗结束时及随访时,克霉唑和益康唑治疗有效患者的比例分别为73%和50%。因不良反应导致提前终止治疗的比例,克霉唑组为26.7%,益康唑组为20%。在皮肤癣菌感染治疗结束时,克霉唑和益康唑治疗有效患者的比例分别为46%和61%。在总体评估(治疗结束后6周)时,益康唑在72%的治疗部位被判定有效,而克霉唑为61%,这一差异无统计学意义(P = 0.15)。克霉唑治疗组有3例复发(4%),益康唑组有1例复发(1%)。1例使用1%益康唑乳膏治疗的患者因药物不良反应提前终止治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验