Gillen M S, Miller B, Chaikin P, Morganroth J
Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Aug;52(2):201-4. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01345.x.
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of high doses of ebastine with terfenadine and placebo on QTc.
Thirty-two subjects were randomly assigned to four treatments (ebastine 60 mg x day(-1), ebastine 100 mg x day(-1), terfenadine 360 mg x day(-1), placebo) administered for 7 days. Serial ECGs were performed at baseline and day 7 of each period. QT interval was analysed using both Bazett (QTcB) and Fridericia (QTcF) corrections.
Ebastine 60 mg (+ 3.7 ms) did not cause a statistically significant change in QTcB compared with placebo (+ 1.4 ms). The mean QTcB for ebastine 100 mg was increased by + 10.3 ms which was significantly greater than placebo but was significantly less (P < 0.05) than with terfenadine 360 mg (+ 18.0 ms). There were no statistically significant differences in QTcF between ebastine 60 mg (-3.2 ms) or ebastine 100 mg (1.5 ms) and placebo (-2.1 ms); although terfenadine caused a 14.1 ms increase which was significantly different from the other three treatments. The increase in QTcB with ebastine most likely resulted from overcorrection of the small drug-induced increase in heart rate.
Ebastine at doses up to five times the recommended therapeutic dose did not cause clinically relevant changes in QTc interval.
本研究的目的是比较高剂量依巴斯汀与特非那定及安慰剂对QTc的影响。
32名受试者被随机分配至四种治疗组(依巴斯汀60毫克/天、依巴斯汀100毫克/天、特非那定360毫克/天、安慰剂),治疗7天。在每个疗程的基线和第7天进行系列心电图检查。使用Bazett法(QTcB)和Fridericia法(QTcF)校正分析QT间期。
与安慰剂(+1.4毫秒)相比,依巴斯汀60毫克(+3.7毫秒)未引起QTcB的统计学显著变化。依巴斯汀100毫克的平均QTcB增加了+10.3毫秒,显著大于安慰剂,但显著小于特非那定360毫克(+18.0毫秒)(P<0.05)。依巴斯汀60毫克(-3.2毫秒)或依巴斯汀100毫克(1.5毫秒)与安慰剂(-2.1毫秒)之间的QTcF无统计学显著差异;尽管特非那定导致增加14.1毫秒,与其他三种治疗有显著差异。依巴斯汀导致的QTcB增加最可能是由于药物引起的心率小幅增加校正过度所致。
高达推荐治疗剂量五倍的依巴斯汀未引起QT间期的临床相关变化。