• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依巴斯汀速溶片(20毫克)与地氯雷他定胶囊(5毫克)对皮肤组胺反应抑制作用的比较:一项针对健康、非特应性成年人的随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照、三周期交叉研究。

Comparison of inhibition of cutaneous histamine reaction of ebastine fast-dissolving tablet (20 mg) versus desloratadine capsule (5 mg): a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study in healthy, nonatopic adults.

作者信息

Antonijoan Rosa, García-Gea Consuelo, Puntes Montserrat, Pérez Joselin, Esbrí Ramón, Serra Cristina, Fortea Josep, Barbanoj Manuel J

机构信息

Centre d Investigació de Medicaments, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Departament de Farmacologia i Terapèutica, Barcelona, Spain.

Almirall SA, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):814-822. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.001
PMID:17697901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ebastine is a long-acting, second-generation, selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist. A fast-dissolving tablet formulation of ebastine has been developed at 10- and 20-mg doses, with the intention of facilitating administration to patients experiencing problems with swallowing, including those confined to bed and elderly people, as well as those who may need to use ebastine when they do not have easy access to water to aid swallowing a tablet.

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to assess the pharmacodynamic effects (ie, inhibition of wheal response to cutaneous histamine challenge, and subjective assessments of itching, flare, and pain) and tolerability of the fast-dissolving 20-mg ebastine tablet formulation compared with desloratadine 5-mg capsule and placebo. Acceptability and convenience of the fast-dissolving tablet were also evaluated.

METHODS

This double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-period crossover study was conducted at the Drug Research Centre, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. Healthy, nonatopic, white adults aged 18 to 40 years were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 study sequences: ABC, ACB, BAC, BCA, CBA, or CAB, where A was the ebastine fast-dissolving 20-mg tablet, B was the desloratadine 5-mg capsule, and C was placebo. All study drugs were given orally once daily (8-9 AM) on days 1 to 5 of each study period. Study periods were separated by a washout period of 7 to 10 days. Histamine skin-prick test (SPT) challenge was performed before study drug administration on day 1 of each period (baseline), and then every 20 minutes for 2 hours after administration and again after 24 hours. The final SPT was 24 hours after the day-5 dose was administered. The primary end point was inhibition o f the histamine response, defined as the percentage reduction from baseline wheal area 24 hours after 5 days of administration. Subjective symptoms (itching, flare, and pain) were assessed by subjects using visual analog scales every 20 minutes for 2 hours after administration on day 1. At study end, acceptability (taste, convenience, and overall preference) of the fast-dissolving tablet and capsule formulations were assessed using a questionnaire completed by subjects. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination, laboratory analysis, physician questioning, and spontaneous reporting.

RESULTS

Thirty-six people were randomized (22 women, 14 men; mean [SD] age, 24.7 [4.1] years; mean [SD] weight, 63.2 [9.9] kg); 35 completed the study (1 subject was lost to follow-up after the second study period). Unadjusted mean (SD) wheal areas 24 hours after dose administration on day 5 were 72.9 (29.5), 115.0 (32.1), and 146.7 (32.2) mm(2), for ebastine, desloratadine, and placebo, respectively. Mean differences in reduction from baseline in wheal area were 29.0% for ebastine versus desloratadine and 43.7% for ebastine versus placebo (both, P < 0.001). Corresponding unadjusted mean (SD) wheal areas 24 hours after administration of the first dose on day 1 were 76.5 (22.5), 128.9 (24.0), and 140.5 (33.1) mm(2). Mean itching, flare, and pain ratings were not significantly different between study drugs. Results from the preference questionnaire indicated that the majority (80%) preferred the ebastine fast-dissolving tablet to the desloratadine capsule (and hypothetically also to tablets and oral solution, which were not tested in this study). Ninety-seven percent of subjects were of the opinion that compliance in the home setting would be facilitated by the fas-tdissolving tablet formulation. Fourteen adverse events (AEs) were reported in 9 (25%) volunteers; all AEs were of mild or moderate intensity. Five occurred with ebastine 20 mg (intermittent somnolence, back pain, pharyngolaryngeal pain, pyrexia, and oral pain [1 patient each]), 5 occurred with desloratadine 5 mg (asthenia [2 patients] and dry mouth, somnolence, and back pain [1 patient each]), and 4 occurred with placebo (diarrhea [2 patients] and somnolence and headache [1 patient each]). The relationship with the study drugs was considered unlikely in 6 cases and possible in the remaining 8 cases. An additional AE (back pain) occurred during a washout period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small study in healthy, nonatopic white subjects, inhibition of the response to histamine injection was significantly greater with the ebastine 20-mg fast-dissolving tablet compared with desloratadine 5-mg capsule and placebo after 1 and 5 days of administration. Most participants expressed an overall preference for the fast-dissolving tablet formulation over capsules. All study drugs were well tolerated.

摘要

背景

依巴斯汀是一种长效的第二代选择性组胺H1受体拮抗剂。已开发出10毫克和20毫克剂量的依巴斯汀速溶片制剂,旨在便于吞咽困难的患者服用,包括卧床患者和老年人,以及那些在难以获得水来辅助吞服片剂时可能需要使用依巴斯汀的患者。

目的

本研究旨在评估20毫克依巴斯汀速溶片制剂与5毫克地氯雷他定胶囊和安慰剂相比的药效学作用(即对皮肤组胺激发试验风团反应的抑制,以及对瘙痒、潮红和疼痛的主观评估)和耐受性。还评估了速溶片的可接受性和便利性。

方法

本双盲、双模拟、随机、安慰剂对照、3期交叉研究在西班牙巴塞罗那圣十字圣保罗医院临床药理学系药物研究中心进行。18至40岁的健康、非特应性白人成年人被随机分配到6种研究序列中的1种:ABC、ACB、BAC、BCA、CBA或CAB,其中A是20毫克依巴斯汀速溶片,B是5毫克地氯雷他定胶囊,C是安慰剂。在每个研究周期的第1至5天,所有研究药物均每日口服一次(上午8 - 9点)。研究周期之间间隔7至10天的洗脱期。在每个周期的第1天(基线)给药前进行组胺皮肤点刺试验(SPT)激发,然后在给药后每20分钟进行2小时,24小时后再次进行。最后一次SPT是在第5天给药后24小时。主要终点是组胺反应的抑制,定义为给药5天后24小时风团面积较基线减少的百分比。在第1天给药后2小时内,受试者每20分钟使用视觉模拟量表评估主观症状(瘙痒、潮红和疼痛)。在研究结束时,使用受试者填写的问卷评估速溶片和胶囊制剂的可接受性(味道、便利性和总体偏好)。使用体格检查、实验室分析、医生询问和自发报告评估耐受性。

结果

36人被随机分组(22名女性,14名男性;平均[标准差]年龄,24.7[4.1]岁;平均[标准差]体重,63.2[9.9]千克);35人完成了研究(1名受试者在第二个研究周期后失访)。在第5天给药后24小时,依巴斯汀、地氯雷他定和安慰剂的未调整平均(标准差)风团面积分别为72.9(29.5)、115.0(32.1)和146.7(32.2)平方毫米。依巴斯汀与地氯雷他定相比,风团面积较基线减少的平均差异为29.0%,依巴斯汀与安慰剂相比为43.7%(两者,P < 0.001)。在第1天首次给药后24小时,相应的未调整平均(标准差)风团面积分别为76.5(22.5)、128.9(24.0)和140.5(33.1)平方毫米。研究药物之间的平均瘙痒、潮红和疼痛评分无显著差异。偏好问卷结果表明,大多数(80%)受试者更喜欢依巴斯汀速溶片而不是地氯雷他定胶囊(假设也优于本研究未测试的片剂和口服溶液)。97%的受试者认为速溶片制剂将有助于在家中服药。9名(25%)志愿者报告了14例不良事件(AE);所有AE均为轻度或中度强度。5例发生在20毫克依巴斯汀组(间歇性嗜睡、背痛、咽喉痛、发热和口腔疼痛[各1例患者]),5例发生在5毫克地氯雷他定组(乏力[2例患者]和口干、嗜睡和背痛[各1例患者]),4例发生在安慰剂组(腹泻[2例患者]和嗜睡及头痛[各1例患者])。6例被认为与研究药物不太可能相关,其余8例可能相关。在洗脱期发生了1例额外的AE(背痛)。

结论

在这项针对健康、非特应性白人受试者的小型研究中,给药1天和5天后,20毫克依巴斯汀速溶片与5毫克地氯雷他定胶囊和安慰剂相比,对组胺注射反应的抑制作用显著更大。大多数参与者总体上更喜欢速溶片制剂而不是胶囊。所有研究药物耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
Comparison of inhibition of cutaneous histamine reaction of ebastine fast-dissolving tablet (20 mg) versus desloratadine capsule (5 mg): a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study in healthy, nonatopic adults.依巴斯汀速溶片(20毫克)与地氯雷他定胶囊(5毫克)对皮肤组胺反应抑制作用的比较:一项针对健康、非特应性成年人的随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照、三周期交叉研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):814-822. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.001.
2
A comparison of ebastine 10 mg fast-dissolving tablet with oral desloratadine and placebo in inhibiting the cutaneous reaction to histamine in healthy adults.10毫克依巴斯汀速溶片与口服地氯雷他定及安慰剂在抑制健康成年人组胺引起的皮肤反应方面的比较。
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(7):453-61. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727070-00002.
3
Comparison of inhibition of cutaneous histamine reaction of ebastine fast-dissolving tablet [20 mg] versus desloratadine capsule [5 mg]: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study in healthy, nonatopic adults.
Clin Ther. 2007 Dec;29(12):2774-5, author reply 2775-6. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(07)00408-0.
4
Efficacy of ebastine, cetirizine, and loratadine in histamine cutaneous challenges.依巴斯汀、西替利嗪和氯雷他定在组胺皮肤激发试验中的疗效。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Sep;89(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61952-7.
5
Comparative efficacy of bilastine, desloratadine and rupatadine in the suppression of wheal and flare response induced by intradermal histamine in healthy volunteers.比拉斯汀、地氯雷他定和卢帕他定对健康志愿者皮内注射组胺所致风团和潮红反应抑制作用的疗效比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jan;33(1):129-136. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1240665. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
6
Activity of ebastine (10 and 20 mg) and cetirizine at 24 hours of a steady state treatment in the skin of healthy volunteers.在健康志愿者皮肤中进行稳态治疗24小时时,依巴斯汀(10毫克和20毫克)和西替利嗪的活性。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Jul-Aug;14(4):409-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2000.tb00423.x.
7
Ebastine in allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.依巴斯汀在变应性鼻炎和慢性特发性荨麻疹中的应用
Allergy. 2008 Dec;63 Suppl 89:1-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01897.x.
8
Comparison of the effects of desloratadine and levocetirizine on histamine-induced wheal, flare and itch in human skin.地氯雷他定和左西替利嗪对组胺诱导的人体皮肤风团、潮红及瘙痒作用的比较。
Inflamm Res. 2003 Oct;52(10):424-7. doi: 10.1007/s00011-003-1193-5.
9
Inhibition of the histamine wheal by ebastine compared with cetirizine, fexofenadine and loratadine at steady state.与西替利嗪、非索非那定和氯雷他定稳态时相比,依巴斯汀对组胺风团的抑制作用。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 2002;28(6):243-7.
10
A double-blind, randomized, single-dose, crossover comparison of levocetirizine with ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, mizolastine, and placebo: suppression of histamine-induced wheal-and-flare response during 24 hours in healthy male subjects.左西替利嗪与依巴斯汀、非索非那定、氯雷他定、咪唑斯汀及安慰剂的双盲、随机、单剂量、交叉对照比较:健康男性受试者24小时内组胺诱导的风团及潮红反应抑制情况
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Feb;88(2):190-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61995-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved Bioavailability of Ebastine through Development of Transfersomal Oral Films.通过开发传递体口腔膜提高依巴斯汀的生物利用度。
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Aug 23;13(8):1315. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081315.
2
Ebastine in the light of CONGA recommendations for the development of third-generation antihistamines.依巴斯汀——基于 CONGA 推荐的第三代抗组胺药物研发
J Asthma Allergy. 2009 Aug 31;2:73-92. doi: 10.2147/jaa.s3108.