Wares D F, Akhtar M, Singh S
All Africa Leprosy, Tuberculosis and Rehabilitation Training Centre, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Aug;5(8):732-40.
The hill district in Nepal, where access to health care facilities is difficult.
To compare results before and after a decentralised directly observed treatment (DOT) intervention.
Prospective study of patients registered in Dhankuta district, Nepal, 1996-1999. Patients received their intensive phase treatment under health worker supervision via one of three DOT options: 1) ambulatory from the peripheral government health facilities; 2) ambulatory from an international non-governmental organisation (INGO) TB clinic in district centre; or 3) resident in INGO TB hostel in district centre. Historical data from 1995-1996, with unsupervised short-course chemotherapy, were used for comparison.
Of 307 new cases, respectively 126 (41%), 86 (28%) and 95 (31%) took their intensive phase treatment via options 1, 2 and 3. Smear conversion (at 2 months) and cure rates in new smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis cases were respectively 81.6% (vs. 58.8% historical, P = 0.001) and 84.9% (vs. 76.7% historical, P = 0.03). Overall costs to the INGO provider fell by 7%, mainly as a result of staffing reductions in the INGO services made possible by rationalisation with government services during the intervention.
By offering varied DOT delivery routes, including an in-patient option, satisfactory results are possible with DOT even in areas where access to health care facilities is difficult. Provision of in-patient care via an INGO TB hostel allowed a significant proportion of new cases (31%) to receive their intensive phase treatment who otherwise may have had difficulty accessing treatment, due either to the distance to the nearest health facility or to disease severity. Substitution of government hospital beds or local hotel beds for the INGO hostel beds may allow the model to be reproduced elsewhere in similar geographical conditions in Nepal, but further studies should be performed in a non-INGO supported district beforehand.
尼泊尔山区,那里难以获得医疗保健设施。
比较分散式直接观察治疗(DOT)干预前后的结果。
对1996 - 1999年在尼泊尔丹库塔区登记的患者进行前瞻性研究。患者在卫生工作者监督下接受强化期治疗,通过三种DOT方案之一:1)从周边政府卫生设施门诊治疗;2)从区中心的国际非政府组织(INGO)结核病诊所门诊治疗;或3)住在区中心的INGO结核病宿舍。使用1995 - 1996年无监督短程化疗的历史数据进行比较。
在307例新病例中,分别有126例(41%)、86例(28%)和95例(31%)通过方案1、2和3接受强化期治疗。新涂阳肺结核病例的涂片转阴率(2个月时)和治愈率分别为81.6%(与历史数据58.8%相比,P = 0.001)和84.9%(与历史数据76.7%相比,P = 0.03)。INGO提供者的总体成本下降了7%,主要是由于干预期间通过与政府服务合理化使得INGO服务人员减少。
通过提供多种DOT实施途径,包括住院选择,即使在难以获得医疗保健设施的地区,DOT也能取得满意结果。通过INGO结核病宿舍提供住院护理使相当一部分新病例(31%)能够接受强化期治疗,否则这些病例可能因距离最近的卫生设施较远或病情严重而难以获得治疗。用政府医院病床或当地酒店病床替代INGO宿舍病床可能使该模式在尼泊尔类似地理条件的其他地方得以复制,但应事先在非INGO支持的地区进行进一步研究。