Benson M, Junger A, Quinzio L, Fuchs C, Michel A, Sciuk G, Marquardt K, Dudeck J, Hempelmann G
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany.
Methods Inf Med. 2001 Jul;40(3):190-5.
The influence of methods for record keeping on the documentation of vital signs was assessed for the Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS) NarkoData. We compared manually entered blood-pressure readings with automatically collected data. These data were stored in a data-base and subsequently evaluated and analyzed. The data sets were split into two groups, "manual" and "automatic". We evaluated the effect of automatic data collection on the incidence of corrected data, data validity and data variation. Blood-pressure readings of 37,726 data sets were analyzed. We could assess that the method of documentation did influence the data quality. It could not be assessed whether the incorrectness of data during automatic data gathering was caused by artefacts or by the anesthesiologist.
针对麻醉信息管理系统（AIMS）NarkoData，评估了记录保存方法对生命体征记录的影响。我们将手动输入的血压读数与自动收集的数据进行了比较。这些数据存储在数据库中，随后进行评估和分析。数据集被分为“手动”和“自动”两组。我们评估了自动数据收集对校正数据发生率、数据有效性和数据变化的影响。对37726个数据集的血压读数进行了分析。我们可以评估记录方法确实会影响数据质量。无法评估自动数据收集过程中数据的不正确性是由伪影还是麻醉医生造成的。
