Meiller T F, Kelley J I, Baqui A A, DePaola L G
Baltimore College of Dental Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Clin Dent. 2001;12(4):97-103.
Dental unit waterline biofilm has been recognized as a potential point of contamination and a risk to patients with any level of immunocompromise. Biofilm in dental unit waterlines, once established, has proven formidable to efforts in disinfection/disruption. This project compared standardized evaluation techniques by assessing the efficacy of a variety of agents that have been reported or suggested as useful in surface disinfection and/or antiseptic protocols. The zones of inhibition, minimum inhibitory/bactericidal concentrations and use-dilution with stainless steel carrier replicates tests assessed the disinfection of planktonic organisms using standardized microbial testing procedures. The disruption and/or disinfection of planktonic and biofilm organisms within naturally occurring dental unit waterlines were evaluated by culture and scanning electron microscopy. The six commercially available antimicrobial agents used to assess the techniques were bleach (sodium hypochlorite), Cavicide, glutaraldehyde, Listerine Antiseptic, Peridex and Sterilex Ultra. Comparisons between the results for each technique evaluated were determined for each product. All six agents demonstrated antimicrobial efficacy at the working concentrations designated by the manufacturers. Biofilm matrix elimination evaluated by scanning electron microscopy found virtually 0% elimination by glutaraldehyde to an estimated 90% elimination by Sterilex Ultra and bleach after one treatment. Treatment with Cavicide, Listerine Antiseptic and Peridex resulted in negligible elimination of the biofilm matrix. For comparability, the use of standardized testing techniques to evaluate a disinfection agent's efficacy against dental unit waterline contamination is essential. This project demonstrates a model system for evaluating disinfection agents potentially useful in the management of dental unit waterline biofilm, and should assist in educating the dental clinician in the appraisal of existing and future product claims.
牙科设备水线生物膜已被公认为是一个潜在的污染源,对任何免疫功能低下程度的患者都构成风险。牙科设备水线中的生物膜一旦形成,已证明很难通过消毒/清除措施来处理。本项目通过评估各种已报道或被认为可用于表面消毒和/或防腐方案的药剂的功效,比较了标准化评估技术。使用不锈钢载体重复试验的抑菌圈、最低抑菌/杀菌浓度和使用稀释度,通过标准化微生物检测程序评估浮游生物的消毒情况。通过培养和扫描电子显微镜评估天然存在的牙科设备水线中浮游生物和生物膜生物的清除和/或消毒情况。用于评估这些技术的六种市售抗菌剂分别是漂白剂(次氯酸钠)、Cavicide、戊二醛、利斯特林抗菌漱口水、派丽奥和Sterilex Ultra。针对每种产品,确定了所评估的每种技术结果之间的比较。所有六种药剂在制造商指定的工作浓度下均显示出抗菌效果。通过扫描电子显微镜评估生物膜基质清除情况发现,戊二醛处理后几乎没有清除,而Sterilex Ultra和漂白剂处理一次后估计清除率达90%。用Cavicide、利斯特林抗菌漱口水和派丽奥处理后,生物膜基质的清除可忽略不计。为了具有可比性,使用标准化检测技术来评估消毒剂对牙科设备水线污染的功效至关重要。本项目展示了一个用于评估可能对管理牙科设备水线生物膜有用的消毒剂的模型系统,并应有助于指导牙科临床医生评估现有和未来产品的宣称。