• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0.2%洗必泰对牙科设备水线微生物和真菌污染的影响。

Effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine on microbial and fungal contamination of dental unit waterlines.

作者信息

Agahi Raha Habib, Hashemipour Maryam Alsadat, Kalantari Mahsa, Ayatollah-Mosavi Amin, Aghassi Hossein, Nassab Amir Hossein Gandjalikhan

机构信息

Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 May;11(3):351-6.

PMID:25097645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4119368/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is known that dental unit waterline can be a source of infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a mouthwash, chlorhexidine, in controlling microbial and fungal contamination of dental unit waterlines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present experimental study, the water in high-speed handpieces and air/water syringes of 35 dental units in a dental school was investigated microbiologically. Five of the units and one tap water served as controls; 100-200-mL water samples were collected aseptically in sterile containers in the morning after a 2-min purge. Water reservoir bottles were emptied and 50 mL of 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash was introduced into the tank. Then the water syringe was used to flush the waterline until the pink-colored chlorhexidine was observed to flow from the water syringe. Before the next day's session and before the students used the unit, two water samples from the water syringe and water turbine was collected. The samples were transferred to the laboratory. After 48 h at 37°C, the microbial colonies were counted. The number of these colonies was evaluated using colony forming unit CFU. Data were analyzed with Mann - Whitney U test and SPSS 13.5 statistical program. The statistical significance was defined at P ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

All 35 units were contaminated before chlorhexidine use; no contamination was detected after adding chlorhexidine to the waterlines of the units. After week 1, 28 of the 30 treated dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) had values of CFU/mL less than 200.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that the use of chlorhexidine could reduce microbial counts in dental unit waterlines.

摘要

背景

已知牙科设备水线可能是感染源。本研究的目的是评估洗必泰漱口水在控制牙科设备水线微生物和真菌污染方面的效果。

材料与方法

在本实验研究中,对一所牙科学院35台牙科设备的高速手机和空气/水注射器中的水进行了微生物学调查。其中5台设备和一份自来水作为对照;在早上经过2分钟冲洗后,无菌采集100 - 200毫升水样至无菌容器中。清空储水瓶,向水箱中加入50毫升0.2%的洗必泰漱口水。然后使用水注射器冲洗水线,直到观察到粉红色的洗必泰从水注射器中流出。在第二天课程开始前以及学生使用设备前,从水注射器和水涡轮收集两份水样。将样本转移至实验室。在37°C下培养48小时后,对微生物菌落进行计数。使用菌落形成单位CFU评估这些菌落的数量。数据采用曼 - 惠特尼U检验和SPSS 13.5统计程序进行分析。统计学显著性定义为P≤0.05。

结果

在使用洗必泰之前,所有35台设备均被污染;在向设备水线中添加洗必泰后,未检测到污染。第1周后,30条经处理的牙科设备水线(DUWLs)中有28条的CFU/mL值低于200。

结论

本研究表明,使用洗必泰可减少牙科设备水线中的微生物数量。

相似文献

1
Effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine on microbial and fungal contamination of dental unit waterlines.0.2%洗必泰对牙科设备水线微生物和真菌污染的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 May;11(3):351-6.
2
Evaluation of microbial profile in dental unit waterlines and assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of two treating agents.牙科设备水线微生物概况评估及两种处理剂抗菌效果评估
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Summer;37(4):367-71. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.4.l6851n9g01223450.
3
Microbial quality of water in dental unit waterlines.牙科设备水线中的水的微生物质量。
J Res Med Sci. 2009 Sep;14(5):297-300.
4
[Effect of Using Hydrogen Peroxide for Periodic Disinfection Combined With Continuous Disinfection to Control Contamination in Dental Unit Waterline].[使用过氧化氢定期消毒联合持续消毒控制牙科单元水线污染的效果]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jan 20;55(1):217-223. doi: 10.12182/20240160210.
5
Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines.牙科设备水线中的微生物污染
Braz Dent J. 2003;14(1):55-7. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402003000100010. Epub 2003 Jul 31.
6
Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: tap water versus distilled water.降低牙科设备水线中的细菌数量:自来水与蒸馏水的比较。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2002 Aug 15;3(3):1-9.
7
Reduction of bacterial levels in dental unit waterlines.降低牙科设备水线中的细菌水平。
Quintessence Int. 2004 Sep;35(8):630-4.
8
Effects of iodine in microbial control of dental treatment water.碘在牙科治疗用水微生物控制中的作用。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 May 1;12(3):143-51. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1025.
9
Multiparametric analysis of waterline contamination in dental units.牙科设备水线污染的多参数分析
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Nov;62(11):3954-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.11.3954-3959.1996.
10
Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents.降低牙科设备水线中的细菌数量:蒸馏水与抗菌剂的比较
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2002 Oct;30(10):735-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Water Quality and Biofilm Formation in Dental Unit Waterline Systems in Mangaung, South Africa.南非曼加昂牙科设备水线系统中的水质与生物膜形成
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun;75(3):2132-2149. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.12.025. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
2
Periodic detection and disinfection maintenance of dental unit waterlines in dental simulation head model laboratories.牙科模拟头模实验室中牙科设备水线的定期检测与消毒维护
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):5234. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89010-3.
3
Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.牙科手机内部水路中细菌生物膜的流行率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 18;23(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02885-4.
4
Efficacy of chlorhexidine/herbal formulation for microbial reduction in aerosol generated following ultrasonic scaling - A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.洗必泰/草药配方在减少超声洁治产生的气溶胶中微生物方面的疗效——一项双盲随机对照试验。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Jan-Feb;27(1):82-86. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_478_21. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
5
Water Contamination Risks at the Dental Clinic.牙科诊所的水污染风险。
Biology (Basel). 2020 Feb 27;9(3):43. doi: 10.3390/biology9030043.

本文引用的文献

1
An in vitro antimicrobial comparison of miswak extract with commercially available non-alcohol mouthrinses.咀嚼棒提取物与市售非酒精漱口水的体外抗菌比较。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2005 Feb;3(1):18-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2004.00111.x.
2
Microbial contamination of dental unit water systems.牙科设备水系统的微生物污染
J Ir Dent Assoc. 2005 Autumn;51(3):115-8.
3
Microbial quality of water in dental unit reservoirs.牙科设备储水罐中的水的微生物质量。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2004;11(2):355-8.
4
Microbiological evaluation of dental unit water systems in general dental practice in Europe.欧洲普通牙科诊所牙科设备水系统的微生物学评估。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Oct;112(5):412-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00151.x.
5
Effects of a chlorhexidine gluconate-containing mouthwash on the vitality and antimicrobial susceptibility of in vitro oral bacterial ecosystems.含葡萄糖酸洗必泰漱口水对体外口腔细菌生态系统活力及抗菌敏感性的影响
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Aug;69(8):4770-6. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4770-4776.2003.
6
Control methods of the microbial water quality in dental unit waterlines.牙科设备水线微生物水质的控制方法
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2003;10(1):1-4.
7
Microbiological evaluation of a range of disinfectant products to control mixed-species biofilm contamination in a laboratory model of a dental unit water system.在牙科单位水系统的实验室模型中,对一系列消毒剂产品进行微生物学评估,以控制混合菌种生物膜污染。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jun;69(6):3327-32. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.6.3327-3332.2003.
8
Abundance and characteristics of the recreational water quality indicator bacteria Escherichia coli and enterococci in gull faeces.鸥粪便中娱乐用水水质指示菌大肠杆菌和肠球菌的丰度及特征
J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(5):865-78. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01910.x.
9
Evaluation of the efficacy of Alpron disinfectant for dental unit water lines.阿尔普龙消毒剂对牙科设备水线的功效评估。
Br Dent J. 2002 Nov 23;193(10):593-6; discussion 584. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801635.
10
The effect of a disinfectant/coolant irrigant on microbes isolated from dental unit water lines.一种消毒剂/冷却剂冲洗液对从牙科设备水线分离出的微生物的影响。
Spec Care Dentist. 2002 Jul-Aug;22(4):137-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2002.tb01177.x.