• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗记录——它们的法医学意义。

Medical records-their medico-legal significance.

作者信息

Hirsh H L

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1975 Jun;2(3):213-6.

PMID:1151297
Abstract

This article discussed the physician's obligations in record-keeping and current judicial attitude towards the patient's medical record. Physicians are required, both medically and legally, to maintain a current, adequate record for each patient. This established the physician's continuity of care, but it also requires his vigilance and diligence through constant review and surveillance. In the past, the record was exclusively the property of the health care provider. Of late, jurisdictions are decreeing that the health care provider has an absolute right to possession and ownership of the original record only, and the right to the information in the record belongs absolutely to the patient. The physician is liable for the proper maintenance, custody, and storage of the record for the required statutory period. Although the patient can custimarily obtain his record by court order, the courts have also recognized the concept of professional discretion under which a physician may deny the patient access to his medical record if in the physician's judgment he believes it would be to the patient's detriment.

摘要

本文讨论了医生在病历记录方面的义务以及当前司法界对患者病历的态度。从医学和法律角度而言,医生都必须为每位患者保存一份最新、完整的病历。这确立了医生持续的护理责任,但同时也要求医生通过持续审查和监督保持警惕并勤勉尽责。过去,病历完全是医疗服务提供者的财产。近来,各司法管辖区规定,医疗服务提供者仅对原始病历拥有绝对的占有权和所有权,而病历中信息的权利则绝对属于患者。医生有责任在法定要求的期限内妥善维护、保管和存储病历。虽然患者通常可以通过法院命令获取其病历,但法院也认可专业酌处权的概念,即在医生判断认为提供病历会对患者造成损害时,医生可以拒绝患者查阅其病历。

相似文献

1
Medical records-their medico-legal significance.医疗记录——它们的法医学意义。
J Fam Pract. 1975 Jun;2(3):213-6.
2
Medicolegal implications of medical records.
Leg Med Annu. 1975:171-88.
3
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
4
Medical records--legal perspectives.
Prim Care. 1979 Sep;6(3):681-91.
5
Will your medical records get you into trouble?你的病历会给你带来麻烦吗?
Leg Aspects Med Pract. 1978 Sep;6(9):46-51.
6
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
7
CMA Policy Summary. Confidentiality, ownership and transfer of medical records.美国医学协会政策摘要。医疗记录的保密性、所有权和转移。
Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Jul 15;133(2):142A-142B.
8
Privacy, confidentiality, privilege, and the medical record. Part I.
J Am Med Rec Assoc. 1986 Aug;57(8):20-2.
9
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
10
For the record.供记录在案。
J Fla Med Assoc. 1995 Nov;82(11):769-72.