• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[精索静脉曲张:内窥镜检查与手术]

[Varicocele: endoscopy versus surgery].

作者信息

Chouchane A, Menif A, Elkateb A F, Becheikh M, Zenkri M, Balti M H

机构信息

Service de chirurgie, Hôpital des FSI, La Marsa.

出版信息

Tunis Med. 2001 Apr;79(4):216-21.

PMID:11515480
Abstract

Varicocele is a frequent and benign pathology, well known since the antiquity, his treatment has progressed by a better acquaintance of physiology and the effects on fertility. In the surgery department of FSI hospital, we compared the results of 2 surgical methods: the Ivanisevich's technique (open surgery) and the laparoscopic approach. The objective was to compare morbidity, recurrence rate, hospital stay, and effects on pains and fertility. From May 1993 to December 1998 we treated 72 patients with symptomatic varicocele: 40 patients by laparoscopy and 32 by open surgery. The recurrence rate was of 32% for surgery and 21% for laparoscopy. But duration of surgical operation was longer for laparoscopy: 50 mn against 30 mn for unilateral cure and 70 mn against 55 mn for bilateral cure. We did not observe a difference between the 2 groups in hospital stay, morbidity, pains and fertility. At the end of the study we propose laparoscopy for bilateral cure and open surgery for unilateral. Decrease of recurrences needs the realisation of a phlebography before surgery, but this investigation weight routinely "take charge" of patients; we reserve it to recurrences. Echography coupled to Doppler is essentially used for preoperative diagnosis of varicocele and for surveillance of postoperative recurrences.

摘要

精索静脉曲张是一种常见的良性病变,自古以来就为人所知,随着对生理学以及对生育能力影响的进一步了解,其治疗方法也有了进展。在FSI医院外科,我们比较了两种手术方法的结果:伊万尼塞维奇技术(开放手术)和腹腔镜手术。目的是比较发病率、复发率、住院时间以及对疼痛和生育能力的影响。从1993年5月至1998年12月,我们治疗了72例有症状的精索静脉曲张患者:40例行腹腔镜手术,32例行开放手术。开放手术的复发率为32%,腹腔镜手术为21%。但腹腔镜手术的手术时间更长:单侧治愈为50分钟,而开放手术为30分钟;双侧治愈为70分钟,开放手术为55分钟。我们未观察到两组在住院时间、发病率、疼痛和生育能力方面存在差异。在研究结束时,我们建议双侧治愈采用腹腔镜手术,单侧采用开放手术。降低复发率需要在手术前进行静脉造影,但这项检查通常会增加患者的负担;我们仅将其用于复发病例。超声结合多普勒主要用于精索静脉曲张的术前诊断和术后复发监测。

相似文献

1
[Varicocele: endoscopy versus surgery].[精索静脉曲张:内窥镜检查与手术]
Tunis Med. 2001 Apr;79(4):216-21.
2
[Comparison between laparoscopic and open surgical high ligation of the internal spermatic vein].腹腔镜与开放手术高位结扎精索内静脉的比较
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2009 Jul;15(7):625-7.
3
Minimally invasive approach for the treatment of idiopathic varicocele.治疗特发性精索静脉曲张的微创方法。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Apr;7(2):140-3.
4
Laparoscopic Palomo varicocele surgery: lessons learned after 10 years' follow up of 156 consecutive pediatric patients.腹腔镜Palomo精索静脉曲张手术:156例连续儿科患者10年随访后的经验教训
J Pediatr Urol. 2009 Apr;5(2):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
5
Comparing three different surgical techniques used in adult bilateral varicocele.比较用于成人双侧精索静脉曲张的三种不同手术技术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2012 Feb;5(1):12-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00109.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
6
Varicocelectomy for male infertility: a comparative study of open, laparoscopic and microsurgical approaches.精索静脉曲张切除术治疗男性不育症:开放手术、腹腔镜手术及显微外科手术方法的比较研究
J Urol. 2008 Jul;180(1):266-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.050. Epub 2008 May 21.
7
[Comparative assessment of extraperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic methods of varicocele treatment].
Urologiia. 2008 May-Jun(3):44-9.
8
Results and complications of laparoscopic surgery for pediatric varicocele.小儿精索静脉曲张腹腔镜手术的结果与并发症
J Pediatr Surg. 2001 May;36(5):767-9. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22956.
9
[Association of surgical treatment and oxygen active forms with fertility at patients with varicocele].[精索静脉曲张患者手术治疗及氧活性形式与生育能力的关联]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2007(12):39-42.
10
Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.腹腔镜与开放半结肠切除术
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):491-502, 502-7.