Deutsch A, Barber J E, Davy D T, Victoroff B N
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kelsey Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX 77025, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Jul-Aug;10(4):340-52. doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.115365.
This study compared the biomechanical effects of an anterior-inferior capsular shift based at the humeral side with one on the glenoid side of the joint on resultant multidirectional glenohumeral translation and rotation. Nine matched pairs of fresh cadaveric shoulders were placed in a testing apparatus that constrained 3 rotations but allowed simultaneous free translation of the humeral head with respect to the glenoid. The right and left shoulders of each of the matched pairs were randomized to undergo either a glenoid-based or humeral-based anterior capsular shift. The shoulders were tested vented and following the capsular shift procedure. Translational testing was performed at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees of glenohumeral elevation with the humerus in neutral rotation, 30 degrees internal rotation, and 30 degrees external rotation. Sequential loads of 30 N in anterior, posterior, and inferior directions were applied while maintaining a 22-N joint compressive load. The maximum arc of internal and external rotation after application of a 1-newton-meter moment was determined for the vented specimens and then after the capsular shift procedure. Both shift strategies resulted in significant limitation of anterior, posterior, and inferior translation in all of the tested positions. No significant differences were noted between the 2 shift strategies with respect to restriction of translation in the anterior or inferior directions. The glenoid-based shift caused a significantly greater decrease in posterior translation at 45 degrees and 90 degrees of abduction. With respect to rotation, the glenoid-based shift exerted significantly greater restriction on external rotation than the humeral-based shift. This study supports the use of either a humeral-based or glenoid-based shift to control multidirectional glenohumeral instability. Greater reduction in external rotation was demonstrated after the glenoid-based shift. Specific differences demonstrated in translation control for humeral-based versus glenoid-based capsular shift procedures may be useful in tailoring a procedure for specific instability patterns.
本研究比较了基于肱骨侧的前下关节囊移位与基于关节盂侧的前下关节囊移位对多方向盂肱关节平移和旋转的生物力学影响。九对匹配的新鲜尸体肩部被放置在一个测试装置中,该装置限制了三个方向的旋转,但允许肱骨头相对于关节盂同时自由平移。每对匹配肩部的左右肩随机接受基于关节盂或基于肱骨的前关节囊移位。在关节囊移位手术前后对肩部进行测试。在盂肱关节抬高0度、45度和90度时进行平移测试,此时肱骨处于中立旋转、30度内旋和30度外旋状态。在保持22 N关节压缩负荷的同时,向前、后和下方向施加30 N的顺序负荷。在通风的标本上以及关节囊移位手术后,测定施加1牛顿米力矩后的最大内旋和外旋弧度。两种移位策略均导致所有测试位置的前、后和下平移显著受限。在限制前向或下向平移方面,两种移位策略之间未观察到显著差异。基于关节盂的移位在45度和90度外展时导致后向平移的显著更大减少。关于旋转,基于关节盂的移位对外旋的限制明显大于基于肱骨的移位。本研究支持使用基于肱骨或基于关节盂的移位来控制多方向盂肱关节不稳定。基于关节盂的移位后外旋减少更明显。基于肱骨与基于关节盂的关节囊移位手术在平移控制方面表现出的特定差异可能有助于为特定的不稳定模式量身定制手术。