• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

What I think you think of me: women's reactions to being viewed as beneficiaries of preferential selection.

作者信息

Heilman M E, Alcott V B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York 10003-6634, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2001 Aug;86(4):574-82. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.574.

DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.574
PMID:11519642
Abstract

Undergraduate women (N = 150) participated in 2 experimental studies designed to examine the effects of knowing that another believed they were beneficiaries of preferential selection. Results indicated that participants' awareness that the other viewed them as having been selected on the basis of gender rather than merit (a) prompted inferences that the other held negative expectations of their competence (Studies 1 and 2); (b) produced timid, performance-limiting task decisions as well as negative self-regard when they were uncertain about their task ability level (Studies 1 and 2): and (c) produced ambitious, performance-maximizing task decisions when they knew themselves to be high in task ability and also were motivated to make a good impression (Study 2). In addition, in both studies negative affect resulted from the participants' knowledge that the other viewed them as having been preferentially selected.

摘要

相似文献

1
What I think you think of me: women's reactions to being viewed as beneficiaries of preferential selection.
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Aug;86(4):574-82. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.574.
2
It had to be you (not me)!: Women's attributional rationalization of their contribution to successful joint work outcomes.不是我,是你!:女性对成功的联合工作成果的归因合理化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;39(7):956-69. doi: 10.1177/0146167213486358. Epub 2013 May 7.
3
Type of affirmative action policy: a determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection?平权行动政策的类型:基于性别的优惠选拔反应的决定因素?
J Appl Psychol. 1998 Apr;83(2):190-205. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.190.
4
A comparison of the other-directed stigmatization produced by legal and illegal forms of affirmative action.合法与非法形式的平权行动所产生的他人导向型污名化之比较。
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Feb;88(1):121-30. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.121.
5
Gender, performance level, and competence standards in task groups.任务小组中的性别、表现水平和能力标准。
Soc Sci Res. 2009 Jun;38(2):447-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.10.004.
6
Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as a function of self-monitoring level of decision maker.作为决策者自我监控水平函数的性别歧视和美貌主义在选拔中的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 May;90(3):563-73. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.563.
7
[Women's activated self-representations influence their stereotyping and prejudice toward other traditional and nontraditional women].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2008 Oct;79(4):372-8. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.79.372.
8
When similarity is a liability: effects of sex-based preferential selection on reactions to like-sex and different-sex others.当相似性成为一种负担:基于性别的优先选择对同性别和不同性别他人反应的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 1993 Dec;78(6):917-27. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.917.
9
Motivated to penalize: women's strategic rejection of successful women.受惩罚动机:女性对成功女性的策略性排斥。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Feb;34(2):237-47. doi: 10.1177/0146167207310027.
10
"I'm not gay. . . . I'm a real man!": Heterosexual Men's Gender Self-Esteem and Sexual Prejudice.“我不是同性恋……我是个真正的男人!”:异性恋男性的性别自尊与性偏见
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Sep;35(9):1233-43. doi: 10.1177/0146167209338072. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Nothing Changes, Really: Why Women Who Break Through the Glass Ceiling End Up Reinforcing It.《一成不变:为何突破玻璃天花板的女性最终反而加固了它》
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 May;43(5):638-651. doi: 10.1177/0146167217695551.
2
Balancing Fairness and Efficiency: The Impact of Identity-Blind and Identity-Conscious Accountability on Applicant Screening.平衡公平与效率:身份盲视与身份意识问责制对申请人筛选的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0145208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145208. eCollection 2015.