Bölte S, Poustka F
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters des Klinikums, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main.
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2001 Aug;29(3):221-9. doi: 10.1024//1422-4917.29.3.221.
This study investigated whether empirically derived dimensions of autistic behavior are consistent with the content-valid construction of the autistic behavior domains according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV (social interaction, communication and repetitive, stereotyped behavior).
A principal component exploratory factor analysis routine with varimax-rotation and extraction of factors following the Scree criterion was run using data from the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) of N = 262 individuals exhibiting autism or autistic features.
A three-factor solution consisting of two socio-communicative and one language dimension and accounting for 46.1% of the total variance was found to best describe the data. These factors yielded only vague correspondence with the idea of behavior domains described in ICD-10 and DSM-IV. In addition, factor loadings of items representing repetitive, stereotyped patterns were generally weak.
The factor-analytic approach to autism indicates a conception of the disorder divergent from that defined in the contemporary psychiatric classification systems, especially regarding the area of repetitive, stereotyped behavior.
本研究调查了根据经验得出的自闭症行为维度是否与国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM - IV)中自闭症行为领域的内容效度构建(社交互动、沟通以及重复、刻板行为)相一致。
使用来自262名表现出自闭症或自闭症特征个体的自闭症诊断访谈修订版(ADI - R)的数据,运行具有方差最大化旋转和根据碎石图标准提取因子的主成分探索性因子分析程序。
发现一个由两个社会沟通维度和一个语言维度组成的三因子解决方案,解释了总方差的46.1%,能最好地描述数据。这些因子与ICD - 10和DSM - IV中描述的行为领域概念仅有模糊的对应关系。此外,代表重复、刻板模式的项目的因子载荷通常较弱。
自闭症的因子分析方法表明该障碍的概念与当代精神科分类系统中定义的概念不同,尤其是在重复、刻板行为领域。