Kaneda T, Iemura J, Oka H, Inoue T, Zhang Z W, Matsumoto T, Onoe M, Otaki M, Oku H, Ishigami N, Aoshima M
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2001 Jul;15(4):430-4. doi: 10.1007/s100160010038.
Deep infection following thoracic aortic replacement constitutes an extremely serious and life-threatening complication, and its treatment remains a challenge to surgeons. We report our experience involving five patients in whom deep infection occurred around the graft. Four of the five patients were treated by emergency surgery and one was treated by elective surgery. Surgical procedures performed including hemiarch replacement in one case, total arch replacement in one case, suspension of aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement in one case, Bentall procedure in one case, and descending aorta re-replacement in one case. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was detected in four patients, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in one, and Aspergillus in one patient from purulent discharge at the operative site. Reoperative debridement and irrigation drainage were carried out at an early phase of infection. Intermittent irrigation following the reoperation was performed in all cases. In addition, muscle flap filling or omental translocation was carried out in three patients. Although the reported principle of treatment for arterial graft infection is extraanatomical bypass or rereplacement after removal of the infected graft, such procedures may be technically difficult and have a high risk at the thoracic level. Local anti-septic irrigation, administration of antibiotics, and vascular-rich tissue filling are useful procedures, and it appears that it is not always necessary to remove prosthetic grafts.
