Droog E J, Steenbergen W, Sjöberg F
The Burns Unit, Dept. of Hand and Plastic Surgery, the University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Burns. 2001 Sep;27(6):561-8. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(01)00021-3.
Laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI), is a further development in laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Its advantage is that it enables assessment of microvascular blood flow in a predefined skin area rather than, as for LDF, in one place. In many ways this method seems to be more promising than LDF in the assessment of burn wounds. However, several methodological issues that are inherent in the LDPI technique, and are relevant for the assessment of burn depth, must be clarified. These include the effect of scanning distance, curvature of the tissue, thickness of topical wound dressings, and pathophysiological effects of skin colour, blisters, and wound fluids. Furthermore, we soon realised that to examine the perfusion image generated by LDPI adequately the process of analysis was appreciably improved by the simultaneous use of digital photography. In the present investigation we used both in vitro and in vivo models and also examined burned patients, and found that the listed factors all significantly affected the LDPI output signal. However, if these factors are known to the examiner, most of them can be adjusted for. If the technique is further improved by minimizing such effects and by reducing the practical difficulties of applying it to a burned patient in the burns unit, the technique may find uses in everyday clinical decision-making.
激光多普勒灌注成像(LDPI)是激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)的进一步发展。其优点在于它能够评估预定义皮肤区域的微血管血流,而不像LDF那样只能评估一个点的血流。在评估烧伤创面方面,这种方法在很多方面似乎比LDF更有前景。然而,LDPI技术中固有的、与烧伤深度评估相关的几个方法学问题必须阐明。这些问题包括扫描距离的影响、组织的曲率、局部伤口敷料的厚度以及皮肤颜色、水泡和伤口渗出液的病理生理影响。此外,我们很快意识到,为了充分检查LDPI生成的灌注图像,通过同时使用数码摄影,分析过程得到了显著改善。在本研究中,我们使用了体外和体内模型,还检查了烧伤患者,发现所列因素均显著影响LDPI输出信号。然而,如果检查者了解这些因素,大多数因素是可以进行调整的。如果通过尽量减少此类影响并降低将该技术应用于烧伤病房烧伤患者的实际困难来进一步改进该技术,那么该技术可能会在日常临床决策中得到应用。