• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比索洛尔和醋丁洛尔对高血压患者静息血压及运动血压曲线的影响:一项比较性单盲研究。

Effect of bisoprolol and acebutolol on resting blood pressure and on exercise blood pressure profile in hypertensive patients: a comparative, single-blind study.

作者信息

Bouvier J M, Rabot D, Herrero G

机构信息

Admissions et Urgences, Centre Hospitalier Regional, Angers, France.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16 Suppl 5:S179-83.

PMID:11527124
Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and the safety of bisoprolol (B) and acebutolol (A) on blood pressure at rest and during exercise in hypertensives. The design was a comparative, single-blind study with two phases following a 10-day washout period for pretreated patients: a 15 day-placebo phase and an 8-week therapeutic phase. Forty-six outpatients suffering from mild to moderate essential hypertension [diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ranging between 95 and 120 mm Hg] were randomly given either 10 mg of bisoprolol or 400 mg of acebutolol once a day for 8 weeks; this dosage was doubled after 4 weeks if DBP was still above 90 mm Hg. Blood pressure measurements were made 24 h after drug intake at rest and during exercise stress tests and were performed at the end of the placebo period and after 1 and 2 months of active treatment. Serum lipid levels were also measured before and at the end of the study. Forty-four patients (21 B/23 A) were analyzed for resting blood pressures and 33 (15 B/18 A) for exercise blood pressure profile. At the end of the first month of treatment, a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in supine and upright systolic (SBP) and DBP was noted in both groups. The reduction in supine DBP after 4 weeks was significantly greater with B (p = 0.036). A further decrease of blood pressure was observed in both groups during the second month of treatment, which was significant only in supine SBP (p < 0.05). After 2 months, the heart rate decreased by 24% with B and 13% with A (B vs. A; p = 0.002). Regarding the BP profile during exercise, B and A caused a similar and significant reduction in both SBP and DBP (p < 0.001). The reduction in heart rate during exercise was more marked with B, with no significant difference between the two groups. Side effects were reported in three patients on B and six on A. Both at rest and during exercise, at a level of effort similar to that of daily activities, B exerted a hypotensive effect at least equivalent to that of A in mild and moderate hypertensive patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较比索洛尔(B)和醋丁洛尔(A)对高血压患者静息及运动时血压的疗效和安全性。研究设计为一项对比性单盲研究,对经过预处理的患者,在10天的洗脱期后分为两个阶段:15天的安慰剂阶段和8周的治疗阶段。46例轻至中度原发性高血压患者[舒张压(DBP)在95至120mmHg之间]被随机给予每天1次10mg比索洛尔或400mg醋丁洛尔,持续8周;如果4周后DBP仍高于90mmHg,则剂量在4周后加倍。在药物摄入24小时后、静息及运动应激试验时测量血压,并在安慰剂期结束时以及积极治疗1个月和2个月后进行测量。在研究开始前及结束时也测量血清脂质水平。对44例患者(21例使用B/23例使用A)分析静息血压,对33例患者(15例使用B/18例使用A)分析运动血压情况。在治疗的第一个月末,两组的仰卧位和直立位收缩压(SBP)及DBP均显著下降(p<0.001)。4周后,B组仰卧位DBP的下降幅度显著更大(p=0.036)。在治疗的第二个月,两组血压进一步下降,仅仰卧位SBP下降显著(p<0.05)。2个月后,B组心率下降24%,A组下降13%(B组与A组比较;p=0.002)。关于运动时的血压情况,B和A对SBP和DBP均产生相似且显著的降低作用(p<0.001)。运动时B组心率下降更明显,两组间无显著差异。报告使用B的3例患者和使用A的6例患者出现副作用。在静息及运动时,在与日常活动相似强度的运动水平下,B对轻、中度高血压患者的降压作用至少与A相当。

相似文献

1
Effect of bisoprolol and acebutolol on resting blood pressure and on exercise blood pressure profile in hypertensive patients: a comparative, single-blind study.比索洛尔和醋丁洛尔对高血压患者静息血压及运动血压曲线的影响:一项比较性单盲研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16 Suppl 5:S179-83.
2
Bisoprolol and nifedipine SR in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly.比索洛尔与硝苯地平缓释片治疗老年高血压
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16 Suppl 5:S95-9.
3
Age dependence of therapy result and risk in the treatment of arterial hypertension?动脉高血压治疗中治疗效果及风险的年龄依赖性?
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16 Suppl 5:S184-8.
4
Bisoprolol vs. chlorthalidone: a randomized, double-blind, comparative study in arterial hypertension.比索洛尔与氯噻酮:一项关于动脉高血压的随机、双盲、对比研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16 Suppl 5:S189-92.
5
[A Brazilian multicenter study to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and tolerance of isradipine SRO using ambulatory monitoring of arterial pressure in the treatment of mild and moderate arterial hypertension].[一项巴西多中心研究,旨在通过动态血压监测评估伊拉地平缓释片在治疗轻度和中度动脉高血压中的临床疗效和耐受性]
Arq Bras Cardiol. 1993 Nov;61(5):311-8.
6
Efficacy and safety of sibutramine for weight loss in obese patients with hypertension well controlled by beta-adrenergic blocking agents: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised trial.西布曲明用于β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂良好控制血压的肥胖高血压患者减肥的疗效和安全性:一项安慰剂对照、双盲、随机试验
J Hum Hypertens. 2002 Jan;16(1):13-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001299.
7
Antihypertensive effects on blood pressure at rest and during exercise of calcium antagonists, beta-receptor blockers, and their combination in hypertensive patients.钙拮抗剂、β受体阻滞剂及其联合用药对高血压患者静息和运动时血压的降压作用。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1037-42.
8
[The clinical efficiency and safety of bisoprolol hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension].比索洛尔氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度原发性高血压患者的临床疗效及安全性
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2006 Jul;34(7):605-8.
9
[Comparative study of bisoprolol and celiprolol in to moderate hypertension using casual as well as ambulatory blood pressure measurements].[使用偶测血压及动态血压测量法对比比索洛尔与塞利洛尔治疗轻至中度高血压的研究]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1994 May;43(5):301-6.
10
Beta-blockers vs. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertension: effects on left ventricular hypertrophy.β受体阻滞剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗高血压:对左心室肥厚的影响
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16 Suppl 5:S145-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic Properties of Highly Selective β-blockers With or Without Additional Vasodilator Properties: Focus on Bisoprolol and Nebivolol in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.高度选择性β受体阻滞剂的治疗特性,具有或不具有额外的血管扩张特性:以比索洛尔和奈必洛尔为例,用于心血管疾病患者。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022 Oct;36(5):959-971. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07205-y. Epub 2021 Jun 9.