Miyahara M, Möbs I, Doll-Tepper G
Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Sportwissenschaften, Abteilung Behindertensport, Berlin, Germany.
Child Care Health Dev. 2001 Sep;27(5):413-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00220.x.
The aim of this study was to examine whether or not there were any differences in the severity of hyperactivity and the comorbidity of hyperactivity with clumsiness due to the sampling sources of hyperactive children. It was hypothesized that hyperactivity would be more severe and the comorbidity higher in the hospital sample than in the community support group and the school sample. A total of 47 hyperactive children were assessed with the German version of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS) and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (Movement ABC). The hypotheses were not supported by the results. Although the school sample demonstrated the least prevalence rate of comorbid clumsiness, their conduct problems were rated higher than were the hospital and the support group samples. The possible difference in teachers' perception was discussed in terms of their understanding and communication with parents and professionals. The need to determine the effect of inattention on manual performance is addressed with a research strategy.
本研究的目的是探讨由于多动症儿童的抽样来源不同,多动症的严重程度以及多动症与动作笨拙的共病情况是否存在差异。研究假设为,与社区支持组和学校样本相比,医院样本中的多动症会更严重,共病情况也更高。共有47名多动症儿童接受了德文版的康纳斯教师评定量表(CTRS)和儿童运动评估量表(Movement ABC)的评估。研究结果不支持这些假设。尽管学校样本中动作笨拙共病的患病率最低,但他们的行为问题得分高于医院样本和支持组样本。从教师与家长及专业人员的理解和沟通方面讨论了教师认知可能存在的差异。通过一项研究策略探讨了确定注意力不集中对手部操作影响的必要性。