Hoagwood K, Burns B J, Kiser L, Ringeisen H, Schoenwald S K
National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Sep;52(9):1179-89. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.9.1179.
The authors review the status, strength, and quality of evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health services. The definitional criteria that have been applied to the evidence base differ considerably across treatments, and these definitions circumscribe the range, depth, and extensionality of the evidence. The authors describe major dimensions that differentiate evidence-based practices for children from those for adults and summarize the status of the scientific literature on a range of service practices. The readiness of the child and adolescent evidence base for large-scale dissemination should be viewed with healthy skepticism until studies of the fit between empirically based treatments and the context of service delivery have been undertaken. Acceleration of the pace at which evidence-based practices can be more readily disseminated will require new models of development of clinical services that consider the practice setting in which the service is ultimately to be delivered.
作者们回顾了儿童和青少年心理健康服务中循证实践的现状、优势及证据质量。应用于证据基础的定义标准在不同治疗方法之间差异很大,这些定义限定了证据的范围、深度和外延。作者们描述了区分儿童循证实践和成人循证实践的主要维度,并总结了一系列服务实践的科学文献现状。在对基于实证的治疗方法与服务提供背景之间的适配性进行研究之前,对于儿童和青少年证据基础进行大规模传播的准备情况应持谨慎怀疑态度。加快循证实践更易于传播的速度将需要新的临床服务发展模式,这种模式要考虑到服务最终提供的实践环境。