• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

少年司法环境中家庭驱动式照护实施的情境决定因素。

Contextual determinants of family-driven care implementation in juvenile justice settings.

作者信息

Piper Kaitlin N, Jahn Alexandra, Escoffery Cam, Woods-Jaeger Briana, Schwartz David P, Smith-Curry Cathy, Sales Jessica

机构信息

Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Juvenile Justice, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Health Justice. 2024 Aug 8;12(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00290-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40352-024-00290-9
PMID:39117937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11311941/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Engaging families in behavioral health services is a high priority for juvenile justice (JJ) systems and family advocacy groups. Family-driven care (FDC) enhances family engagement and decision-making power in youth behavioral health services, ultimately, improving youth and family mental health and substance abuse outcomes. Despite the benefits, there is limited guidance on how to integrate FDC into behavioral health care within the JJ system. Therefore, the goal of this study is to understand factors that promoted adoption of FDC the JJ context.

METHODS

JJ staff and leadership across the state of Georgia participated in surveys and interviews to understand contextual implementation determinants related to the adoption of FDC. Between November 2021- July 2022, 140 JJ staff participated in the survey from 61 unique JJ organizations. In addition, 16 staff participated in follow-up key informant interviews to explain quantitative findings.

RESULTS

Based on a mixed methods analysis, JJ agencies were more likely to implement FDC if they had the following characteristics: (1) presence of site leaders that were strongly committed to family engagement, (2) a shared understanding that family engagement was a top priority, (3) staff training related to family engagement, (4) external partnerships with organizations that serve families, (5) a workplace culture that was supportive of innovation, and (6) presence of family engagement programs that were easier (or more feasible) for staff to implement.

DISCUSSION

This mixed methods study underscores the importance of strengthening these 6 inner and outer setting implementation determinants when preparing to integrate FDC into JJ systems. Findings are used to promote the adoption and delivery of this high priority intervention in a state-level JJ system.

摘要

引言

让家庭参与行为健康服务是青少年司法(JJ)系统和家庭倡导团体的高度优先事项。家庭驱动式照护(FDC)增强了家庭在青少年行为健康服务中的参与度和决策权,最终改善了青少年和家庭的心理健康及药物滥用状况。尽管有这些益处,但关于如何将FDC融入JJ系统内的行为健康照护方面的指导却很有限。因此,本研究的目标是了解在JJ环境中促进采用FDC的因素。

方法

佐治亚州各地的JJ工作人员和领导层参与了调查和访谈,以了解与采用FDC相关的背景实施决定因素。在2021年11月至2022年7月期间,140名JJ工作人员从61个不同的JJ组织参与了调查。此外,16名工作人员参与了后续的关键 informant 访谈,以解释定量研究结果。

结果

基于混合方法分析,如果JJ机构具有以下特征,则更有可能实施FDC:(1)有坚定致力于家庭参与的现场领导;(2)对家庭参与是首要优先事项有共同理解;(3)与家庭参与相关的工作人员培训;(4)与为家庭服务的组织建立外部伙伴关系;(5)支持创新的工作场所文化;(6)有工作人员更容易(或更可行)实施的家庭参与计划。

讨论

这项混合方法研究强调了在准备将FDC融入JJ系统时加强这6个内部和外部环境实施决定因素的重要性。研究结果用于在州级JJ系统中促进采用和提供这一高度优先的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f7/11311941/e5df986175fe/40352_2024_290_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f7/11311941/e5df986175fe/40352_2024_290_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f7/11311941/e5df986175fe/40352_2024_290_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Contextual determinants of family-driven care implementation in juvenile justice settings.少年司法环境中家庭驱动式照护实施的情境决定因素。
Health Justice. 2024 Aug 8;12(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00290-9.
2
A mixed methods evaluation of family-driven care implementation in juvenile justice agencies in Georgia.对佐治亚州青少年司法机构中家庭驱动式照护实施情况的混合方法评估。
Health Justice. 2024 Feb 26;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00261-0.
3
The comparative effectiveness of Core versus Core+Enhanced implementation strategies in a randomized controlled trial to improve substance use treatment receipt among justice-involved youth.在一项随机对照试验中,比较核心策略与核心+强化策略对改善有犯罪经历的青少年接受药物使用治疗的效果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):1535. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08902-6.
4
The Benefits of Community and Juvenile Justice Involvement in Organizational Research.社区与青少年司法参与组织研究的益处。
J Juv Justice. 2017;6(1):112-124.
5
Conditions of successful treatment referral practices with justice-involved youth: Qualitative insights from probation and service provider staff involved in JJ-TRIALS.成功治疗转介实践的条件:参与 JJ-TRIALS 的缓刑和服务提供者工作人员的定性见解。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jul;162:209358. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209358. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
6
The Juvenile Justice Behavioral Health Services Cascade: A new framework for measuring unmet substance use treatment services needs among adolescent offenders.青少年司法行为健康服务梯级:一种衡量青少年罪犯未满足的物质使用治疗服务需求的新框架。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Mar;74:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
7
Juvenile probation staff perceptions of engaging families in substance use services.青少年缓刑工作人员对让家庭参与物质使用服务的看法。
Fam Relat. 2024 Jul;73(3):2079-2102. doi: 10.1111/fare.12974. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
8
Preventing opioid use among justice-involved youth as they transition to adulthood: leveraging safe adults (LeSA).预防有犯罪记录的青少年在向成年期过渡期间使用阿片类药物:利用安全成年人(LeSA)。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):2133. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12127-3.
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Caregiver and Juvenile Justice Personnel Perspectives on challenges and importance of caregiver engagement and the potential utility of a peer navigator program in the Juvenile Justice System.照顾者与少年司法人员对照顾者参与的挑战和重要性以及同伴导航计划在少年司法系统中的潜在效用的看法。
Health Justice. 2023 Aug 5;11(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40352-023-00231-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Juvenile probation staff perceptions of engaging families in substance use services.青少年缓刑工作人员对让家庭参与物质使用服务的看法。
Fam Relat. 2024 Jul;73(3):2079-2102. doi: 10.1111/fare.12974. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
2
Conditions of successful treatment referral practices with justice-involved youth: Qualitative insights from probation and service provider staff involved in JJ-TRIALS.成功治疗转介实践的条件:参与 JJ-TRIALS 的缓刑和服务提供者工作人员的定性见解。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jul;162:209358. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209358. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
A mixed methods evaluation of family-driven care implementation in juvenile justice agencies in Georgia.
对佐治亚州青少年司法机构中家庭驱动式照护实施情况的混合方法评估。
Health Justice. 2024 Feb 26;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00261-0.
4
The Missing Link(age): Multilevel Contributors to Service Uptake Failure Among Youths on Community Justice Supervision.《缺失的环节(年龄):社区司法监督下的青少年服务接受失败的多层次因素》
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 May 1;72(5):546-554. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000163. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
5
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implementation in Family Planning Services Across the Southern United States: Findings from a Survey Among Staff, Providers and Administrators Working in Title X-Funded Clinics.美国南部计划生育服务中暴露前预防的实施情况:在 Title X 基金诊所工作的工作人员、提供者和管理人员调查中的发现。
AIDS Behav. 2021 Jun;25(6):1901-1912. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-03120-9. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
6
Where is the Family in Young Adult Substance Use Treatment? The Case for Systemic Family Therapy for Young Adults with Substance Use Disorders.在针对青少年药物使用的治疗中,家庭处于什么位置?对患有药物使用障碍的青少年进行系统性家庭治疗的理由。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1659-1670. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00471-1. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Bridging Systems to Implement HIV/STI Programming Within the Juvenile Justice System: Strengths and Challenges of a Local Change Team Approach.桥接系统,在少年司法系统中实施艾滋病毒/性传播感染规划:地方变革团队方法的优势和挑战。
AIDS Educ Prev. 2020 Oct;32(5):432-453. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2020.32.5.432.
8
National Survey of Juvenile Community Supervision Agency Practices and Caregiver Involvement in Behavioral Health Treatment.青少年社区监管机构实践与照顾者参与行为健康治疗的全国性调查。
J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Nov;28(11):3110-3120. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01488-4. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
9
Comparison of the Overlap between Juvenile Justice Processing and Behavioral Health Screening, Assessment and Referral.青少年司法程序与行为健康筛查、评估及转诊之间重叠情况的比较
J Appl Juv Justice Serv. 2018;2018:97-125.
10
Measuring Constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research in the Context of Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Center.在联邦合格健康中心增加结直肠癌筛查背景下测量实施研究综合框架的构建要素。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4178-4203. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13035. Epub 2018 Sep 10.