Hoozemans M J, van der Beek A J, Frings-Dresena M H, van der Molen H F
Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, AmCOGG Amsterdam Centre for Research into Health and Health Care, Academic Medical Centre/University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Appl Ergon. 2001 Oct;32(5):509-16. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(01)00021-7.
The objective of the present study was to determine the validity of methods to assess push/pull forces exerted in a construction task. Forces assessed using a hand-held digital force gauge were compared to those obtained using a highly accurate measuring frame. No significant differences were found between the methods, except for peak push forces, for which the forces assessed with the force gauge were significantly lower than those assessed with the measuring frame. When the construction task was reproduced close to the actual workplace by simulation against a fixed object using the force gauge, all exerted forces on the force gauge were significantly lower than those on the measuring frame, except for mean pull forces. When self-reports were compared to the exerted forces on the measuring frame, the construction workers overestimated the exerted push/pull forces by 50%. In conclusion, when applied for direct measurements, the force gauge can be used to validly assess push/pull forces at the workplace.
本研究的目的是确定评估建筑任务中推/拉力施加方法的有效性。将使用手持式数字测力计评估的力与使用高精度测量框架获得的力进行比较。除了峰值推力外,两种方法之间未发现显著差异,测力计评估的峰值推力明显低于测量框架评估的峰值推力。当使用测力计通过模拟靠在固定物体上在接近实际工作场所的环境中重现建筑任务时,除了平均拉力外,测力计上施加的所有力均明显低于测量框架上的力。当将自我报告与测量框架上施加的力进行比较时,建筑工人高估了施加的推/拉力50%。总之,当用于直接测量时,测力计可用于有效评估工作场所的推/拉力。