Vaira M, Barone R, Aghemo B, Mioli P R, De Simone M
ASO S. Giovanni-TO, Centro di Chirurgia Oncologica Avanzata, Università degli Studi, Torino, Italy.
Minerva Med. 2001 Aug;92(4):207-11.
An innovative approach to peritoneal neoplasm therapy is based on the surgical exeresis of visceral neoplasms, peritonectomy and lastly perfusion of the abdominal cavity with cytostatic drugs in hypothermia (1PCH). Cisplatin (CDDP) is one of the most frequently used drugs for peritoneal perfusion owing to its excellent synergy with hypothermia, reduced ability to penetrate the peritoneal- plasma barrier and its demonstrated efficacy against the majority of neoplasms causing peritoneal carcinosis. A major restriction is that CDDP causes renal toxicity. In order to minimise the risk of renal damage, the authors studied the use of amifostin to protect the renal system. A phase-1 study was performed to find the dose of amifostin that guarantees effective renal protection without causing hypotension.
A total of 67 cytoreductions were performed at our centre associated with abdominal cavity perfusion using cytostatic compounds in hyperthermia (1PCH) with CDDP for peritoneal carcinosis. Among the first 9 patients undergoing IPCH without nephroprotection, Grade 2 (WHO) renal toxicity was observed in 4 cases (44%) and Grade IV-WHO toxicity in one patient (11%) leading to hemodialysis and death. Arnifastin was then administered to 18 patients. The administration protocol was as follows: cytoreduction, im. administration of amifostin 910 mg/m2 in 15 minutes, execution of IPCH. All patients treated using this dose presented hypotension with systolic arterial pressure <70 mmHg and amifostin administration was consequently suspended. Amifostin was then administered to a further 18 patients divided into groups of three. The dose used for the first triplet was 400 mg/m2; we then increased the dose by 50 mg/m2 in each subsequent triplet. The maximum dose tolerated was 50 mg/m2 less than the initial dose that caused systolic pressure to fall below 70 mmHg.
Patients treated with doses = or <500 mg/m2 did not present hypotension and it was therefore possible to administer the entire dose. Patients treated with 600 mg/m2 of amifostin all presented hypotension <70 mg Hg, leading to the suspension of the drug. A new triplet of patients was treated at a dose of 550 mg/m2 and none showed hypotension. Taking 550 mg/m2 as the maximum tolerable dose, a further 22 patients then received amifostin infusion with 550 mg/m2 prior to IPCH. Creatinemia was assayed daily for two weeks and creatinine clearance was measured twice a week to evaluate the efficacy of nephroprotection. None of the patients treated with amifostin during the study died from causes correlated to renal failure: 1 patient died from TEP and 1 from septic shock. No patient treated with a dose of 550 mg/m2 developed arterial hypotension. None of the 18 patients in the dose-finding study presented postoperative creatinemia >1.6 (WHO grade 1 toxicity). In the group of 22 patients treated later, 2 cases (9%) presented creatinemia >1.6 (1.8 and 2.1) for a few days; both had undergone severe debulking and one of the patients subsequently underwent resection and anastomosis of the left renal artery invaded by the neoplasm.
Some patients undergoing cytoreduction+IPCH without the use of amifostin developed severe renal toxicity; acute renal failure occurred in 1 patient requiring hemodialysis and was the main cause of death. None of the 28 patients treated with amifostin 550 mg/m2 developed hypotension or renal insufficiency; only 2 cases showed a slight transient increase in renal function markers. Amifostin appears to be an effective drug for protecting renal emunctory from the toxic effects of CDDP used in cytoreduction+IPCH in patients with peritoneal carcinosis. The dose of 550 mg/m2 used in this study does not cause hypotension and is recommended for this type of clinical use.
一种创新的腹膜肿瘤治疗方法是基于对内脏肿瘤进行手术切除、腹膜切除术,最后在低温状态下(1PCH)向腹腔灌注细胞毒性药物。顺铂(CDDP)是腹膜灌注最常用的药物之一,因为它与低温具有良好的协同作用,穿透腹膜 - 血浆屏障的能力降低,并且已证明对大多数导致腹膜癌的肿瘤有效。一个主要限制是CDDP会导致肾毒性。为了将肾损伤风险降至最低,作者研究了使用氨磷汀保护肾脏系统。进行了一项1期研究以确定能保证有效肾脏保护且不引起低血压的氨磷汀剂量。
在我们中心共进行了67例减瘤手术,并在高温(1PCH)下使用细胞毒性化合物与CDDP进行腹腔灌注治疗腹膜癌。在最初9例未进行肾脏保护的接受IPCH的患者中,观察到4例(44%)出现2级(世界卫生组织)肾毒性,1例(11%)出现IV级 - 世界卫生组织毒性,导致血液透析和死亡。然后对18例患者给予氨磷汀。给药方案如下:减瘤手术,肌肉注射氨磷汀910mg/m²,15分钟内注射完毕,然后进行IPCH。所有使用该剂量治疗的患者均出现收缩压<70mmHg的低血压,因此暂停了氨磷汀给药。然后又对另外18例患者给予氨磷汀,分为每组3人的小组。第一组三人使用的剂量为400mg/m²;随后每组剂量增加50mg/m²。最大耐受剂量比导致收缩压降至70mmHg以下的初始剂量低50mg/m²。
使用剂量≤500mg/m²治疗的患者未出现低血压,因此可以给予全部剂量。使用600mg/m²氨磷汀治疗的患者均出现<70mg Hg的低血压,导致药物停用。一组新的三名患者以550mg/m²的剂量进行治疗,均未出现低血压。以550mg/m²作为最大耐受剂量,另外22例患者在IPCH前接受了550mg/m²的氨磷汀输注。连续两周每天检测肌酐水平,并每周两次测量肌酐清除率以评估肾脏保护效果。在研究期间,接受氨磷汀治疗的患者均未因与肾衰竭相关的原因死亡:1例患者死于TEP,1例死于感染性休克。使用550mg/m²剂量治疗的患者均未出现动脉低血压。在剂量探索研究的18例患者中,术后肌酐水平均未>1.6(世界卫生组织1级毒性)。在后来治疗的22例患者组中,2例(9%)在几天内肌酐水平>1.6(1.8和2.1);这两名患者均接受了广泛的肿瘤减瘤手术,其中1例患者随后接受了受肿瘤侵犯的左肾动脉切除和吻合术。
一些未使用氨磷汀进行减瘤手术 + IPCH的患者出现了严重肾毒性;1例患者发生急性肾衰竭,需要进行血液透析,这是主要死亡原因。28例接受550mg/m²氨磷汀治疗的患者均未出现低血压或肾功能不全;仅2例患者的肾功能指标出现轻微短暂升高。氨磷汀似乎是一种有效的药物,可保护腹膜癌患者在减瘤手术 + IPCH中使用CDDP时肾脏排泄器官免受毒性影响。本研究中使用的550mg/m²剂量不会引起低血压,推荐用于此类临床应用。