• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Neltenexine tablets in smoking and non-smoking patients with COPD. A double-blind, randomised, controlled study versus placebo.

作者信息

Cattaneo C

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Diseases, Stradella Hospital, Stradella, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Med. 2001 Aug;92(4):277-84.

PMID:11535971
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this double-blind, randomised, controlled study vs placebo was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of neltenexine (tablets) versus placebo (tablets), administered to smoking and non-smoking patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

Sixty patients with mild stable COPD were recruited. The exclusion criteria were lung cancer, pulmonary tuberculosis, asthma, cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), intercurrent infections, concomitant treatment with corticosteroids, antitussives, beta2 agonists, anticholinergic and other mucolytic agents. The patients were allocated randomly to receive neltenexine (20 smokers and 20 non-smokers) or a matching placebo (20 smokers), 1 tablet twice daily for 20 days. The efficacy criteria were sputum characteristics and volume, difficulty in expectorating, cough, dyspnoea, pulmonary auscultation, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), vital capacity and arterial partial oxygen pressure (PO2). Tolerability was monitored and adverse events were reported.

RESULTS

At the study end, the improvement of patients treated with neltenexine (smokers and non-smokers) was greater and statistically significant as compared with the patients in the placebo group in terms of improvement of dyspnoea (p<0.02), cough (p<0.02), pulmonary auscultation (p<0.02), and difficulty in expectorating (p<0.02). Furthermore, a significant improvement of the sputum characteristics (p<0.02) and volume (p<0.01) was evidenced, as compared with patients treated with placebo, in non smoking patients treated with neltenexine and in smoking patients treated with neltenexine.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed earlier clinical experiences showing that neltenexine is effective in the treatment of COPD patients and highlighted the correlation between abstention from smoking and the efficacy of mucoactive treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
Neltenexine tablets in smoking and non-smoking patients with COPD. A double-blind, randomised, controlled study versus placebo.
Minerva Med. 2001 Aug;92(4):277-84.
2
Oral neltenexine in patients with obstructive airways diseases: an open, randomised, controlled comparison versus sobrerol.阻塞性气道疾病患者口服奈替西汀:与索布瑞醇的开放、随机、对照比较
Minerva Med. 2001 Aug;92(4):269-75.
3
Plant-based formulation in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized double-blind study.植物性制剂用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的管理:一项随机双盲研究。
Respir Med. 2006 Jan;100(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.04.011.
4
[The effect of inhaled ambroxol treatment on clinical symptoms and chosen parameters of ventilation in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients].[吸入氨溴索治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期患者临床症状及选定通气参数的影响]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2001 Sep;11(63):239-43.
5
[Efficacy of tiotropium bromide (Spiriva) in patients with chronic-obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) of different severities].噻托溴铵(思力华)在不同严重程度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的疗效
Pneumologie. 2006 Jun;60(6):341-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-919145.
6
Fentanyl buccal tablet for the relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adult patients with chronic neuropathic pain: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.芬太尼口腔崩解片用于缓解阿片类药物耐受的成年慢性神经性疼痛患者的爆发性疼痛:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):588-601. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.007.
7
Positive benefits of theophylline in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of low-dose, slow-release theophylline in the treatment of COPD for 1 year.在一项为期1年的随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照研究中,低剂量缓释茶碱治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的积极益处。
Respirology. 2006 Sep;11(5):603-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00897.x.
8
Tiotropium administered by a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and spacer produces a similar bronchodilator response as that administered by a Rotahaler in adult subjects with stable moderate-to-severe COPD.对于患有稳定的中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的成年受试者,使用压力定量吸入器(pMDI)和储雾罐给药的噻托溴铵产生的支气管扩张反应与使用旋转式吸入器给药的相似。
Respir Med. 2007 Dec;101(12):2464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
9
Intravenous aminophylline in patients admitted to hospital with non-acidotic exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective randomised controlled trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病非酸中毒加重期住院患者静脉使用氨茶碱:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Thorax. 2005 Sep;60(9):713-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.036046. Epub 2005 Jun 6.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of myrtol standardized in acute bronchitis. A multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group clinical trial vs. cefuroxime and ambroxol.标准桃金娘油在急性支气管炎中的疗效和耐受性。一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照平行组临床试验,与头孢呋辛和氨溴索对比。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2000 Aug;50(8):700-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300276.

引用本文的文献

1
Mucolytic agents versus placebo for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.黏液溶解剂与安慰剂治疗慢性支气管炎或慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;5(5):CD001287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001287.pub6.