Bonner W A
Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA.
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1996 Feb;26(1):27-46. doi: 10.1007/BF01808158.
Historically, parity violation at the contemporary biomolecular level (i.e., only L-amino acids in proteins and D-sugars in DNA and RNA) has been postulated to be the inevitable result of parity violations at the elementary particle level, involving either beta-decay electrons or parity violating energy differences (PVEDs) between enantiomers. These two chiral biases have in turn allegedly impressed a small but persistent chirality onto prebiotic chemistry which, after appropriate amplification, has culminated in our contemporary homochiral biopolymers. Experiments and controversies pertaining to the efficacy of these two chiral biases are reviewed briefly, with the conclusions that: a) there is no experimental evidence supporting the capability of beta-decay electrons or other spin-polarized chiral particles to generate chiral molecules, and b) only theoretical calculations, but no experimental evidence, support the allegation of a causal relation between PVEDs and biomolecular homochirality. We here attempt to examine the latter allegation experimentally. Spontaneous resolution under racemization conditions (SRURC) during the crystallization of the bromofluoro-1,4-benzodiazepinooxazole derivative I is capable of affording products of high enantiomeric purity. This process, which involves very efficient stereoselective autocatalysis, has now been examined statistically. If PVED effects are operative, the SRURC of racemic I should provide, either exclusively or with a strong and consistent bias, only one enantiomer of crystalline I. However, crystallization experiments of racemic I showed no bias in its SRURC, leading to the conclusion that PVED effects are ineffective in dictating a preferred chirality in this system. Several earlier experiments in the literature leading to a similar conclusion as to the inefficacy of PVED effects in promoting a preferred chirality are noted.
从历史角度来看,当代生物分子水平上的宇称不守恒(即蛋白质中仅存在L - 氨基酸,而DNA和RNA中为D - 糖)被假定为基本粒子水平上宇称不守恒的必然结果,这涉及β衰变电子或对映体之间的宇称破缺能量差(PVEDs)。据称,这两种手性偏差又给前生物化学留下了微小但持久的手性印记,经过适当放大后,最终形成了我们当代的同手性生物聚合物。本文简要回顾了与这两种手性偏差有效性相关的实验及争议,得出以下结论:a)没有实验证据支持β衰变电子或其他自旋极化手性粒子能够产生手性分子;b)仅有理论计算,而无实验证据,支持PVEDs与生物分子同手性之间存在因果关系的说法。我们在此尝试通过实验检验后一种说法。溴氟 - 1,4 - 苯并二氮杂卓恶唑衍生物I结晶过程中的外消旋条件下自发拆分(SRURC)能够得到高对映体纯度的产物。这个过程涉及非常高效的立体选择性自催化,目前已进行了统计研究。如果PVED效应起作用,外消旋I的SRURC应该仅产生结晶I的一种对映体,或者产生强烈且一致的偏向。然而,外消旋I的结晶实验表明其SRURC没有偏向,从而得出结论:PVED效应在决定该体系中优先手性方面无效。文中还提到了文献中一些早期实验,这些实验也得出了关于PVED效应在促进优先手性方面无效的类似结论。